Permanently Deleted

  • davel [he/him]
    ·
    7 months ago

    I don’t know what kind of preposterous definition of “Western” you’re hoping to catch me on, but I’m not interested in playing it. Just because a country was once a colony of the UK is not by itself a sufficient reason to call its indigenous population Western.

      • davel [he/him]
        ·
        7 months ago

        If you say so. You’re right though, that this is all a fool’s errand anyway, because most people both within the imperial core and the periphery are creating their competing definitions of “Western” for the purposes of differentiating the in group from the out group.

        • sooper_dooper_roofer [none/use name]
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          this is all a fool’s errand anyway, because most people both within the imperial core and the periphery are creating their competing definitions of “Western” for the purposes of differentiating the in group from the out group.

          Finally.

          The only addendum I'd make is that Latin America doesn't benefit from including itself in this ingroup. As long as the (actual) West controls all the wealth and resources, vicarious ethnic identification with them only gives them more power, and gives Latinos a false sense of safety about their intrusive institutions, like the plan to eventually dot Latin America with their military bases (there are currently very few of these) and in a worst case scenario literal recolonization of Latin America

          https://i.postimg.cc/1zSqXxFr/Screenshot-2023-12-21-at-01-28-27-Western-world-Wikipedia.png

          • davel [he/him]
            ·
            7 months ago

            Oh I agree. I still insist that a hot dog is objectively a taco, though.