• hpca01@programming.dev
      ·
      11 months ago

      And everyone is free to fight you in court and sue the shit out of you if they find a flaw in your design.

      Btw, don't you think that there are others that want to stay but didn't get a chance to? It's just the one dude who gets no water or electricity? No one else wanted to stay in the whole neighborhood?

      What do you think happened before nail houses?

      • ExotiqueMatter@lemmygrad.ml
        ·
        11 months ago

        don’t you think that there are others that want to stay but didn’t get a chance to?

        Making a supposition that maybe there was doesn't make it true. If you think there is you need to prove it, a claim made without proof can be rejected without proof.

          • ExotiqueMatter@lemmygrad.ml
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            "I don't really care anyway, I'm not trying to opt out of an argument I'm losing because I have no comeback and nothing to back what I'm saying"

            Show not mad

          • GarbageShoot [he/him]
            ·
            11 months ago

            The point isn't "freedom of belief", you are "free" to be as delusional as you want. What they are saying is that good epistemic practice dictates that you have some sort of inference from evidence that actually supports your claim rather than "I made it the fuck up".

      • RollaD20 [comrade/them, any]
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        And everyone is free to fight you in court and sue the shit out of you if they find a flaw in your design.

        "The law, in its majestic equality, forbids the rich as well as the poor to sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal bread."

        Wonder how wealth plays into the material reality of going to court. phoenix-think

        How many of those lawsuits against eminent domain in the USA were successful btw?