Reuters reporting doesn't take political sides, they are probably the straightest shooters in western media. Unless you have a source that contradicts this, of course.
And sometimes it's reasonable to have anonymous sources. Especially when we are talking about government insiders, whose actions can have huge impacts on foreign relations.
Unless you have a source that contradicts this, of course.
That source would be Reuters itself lmfao. Well, since you seem to post constantly I'll give you a serious explanation of how deeply wrong you are and how journalism has progressively ceased to exist basically since Vietnam on various fronts and is now just white house stenography and "anonymous sources"
But that would be non shitposting, I'll reply later, remember these are emails
Reuters is just releasing this narrative to make it look like Biden pressuring them is working lol
It's based on random anonymous sources
Also the ghost archive link is broken just fyi
Reuters reporting doesn't take political sides, they are probably the straightest shooters in western media. Unless you have a source that contradicts this, of course.
And sometimes it's reasonable to have anonymous sources. Especially when we are talking about government insiders, whose actions can have huge impacts on foreign relations.
That source would be Reuters itself lmfao. Well, since you seem to post constantly I'll give you a serious explanation of how deeply wrong you are and how journalism has progressively ceased to exist basically since Vietnam on various fronts and is now just white house stenography and "anonymous sources"
But that would be non shitposting, I'll reply later, remember these are emails