From reading the article, "pre-recorded" and "artificial" voices are already prohibited for unsolicited calls, so I don't see what this ruling would actually change other than a slight clarification. It's not like robocallers are actually prosecuted in any meaningful way.
It actually is prosecuted, but you have to file a complaint first.
The only catch is that it has to be from a domestic call center. They have teams whose sole job is preventing TCPA violations, because it's a few grand per violation, so it doesn't happen super often.
From reading the article, "pre-recorded" and "artificial" voices are already prohibited for unsolicited calls, so I don't see what this ruling would actually change other than a slight clarification. It's not like robocallers are actually prosecuted in any meaningful way.
It actually is prosecuted, but you have to file a complaint first.
The only catch is that it has to be from a domestic call center. They have teams whose sole job is preventing TCPA violations, because it's a few grand per violation, so it doesn't happen super often.