• CloutAtlas [he/him]
    ·
    11 months ago

    Ok, let's ignore Reuters because they're probably Chinese shills or the IMF estimating 5.4%, 0.2% higher than the official CCP figure released in Jan because the International Monetary Fund are communist shills as well.

    You've already got it set in your mind, no amount of evidence from even western sources will change your mind, I get it.

    But, hypothetically, it was proven to be 5%. Would you go back and question the sources that told you it wasn't? Or continue to chug along as you are now, taking those sources at face value?

    Chinese journalists who under reported figures 4.8% at the start of Jan found out they were wrong and retracted the articles because it was factually incorrect, western media pounced on it because "Wow China's censoring journalists that says the economy is bad, therefore the only conclusion is their economy is bad, that's the conclusion we're implying here" and then a few days later even Reuters was like "oh yeah it was over 5%" and it's crickets from the people that implied "China SCRUBS CLEAN ALL EVIDENCE OF BAD ECONOMY" you'll continue to remember it as the latter for the rest of your life.

    • deft@lemmy.wtf
      ·
      11 months ago

      Sure just read none of the articles I shared lol.

      Also very cute to pretend to be having a regular conversation just to piss your pants a second later. How about this save this post hit me up in a year let's see if you have the balls to admit you're wrong.

      Spoiler, you won't