Making shit up and still getting beaten by the "lazy" French and Italians.
Stocks in left over black ink from all those old inkjet printers found in landfill sites increase GDP by 4pts this year as it's revealed that adding a bit of water brings then back to liquid.
…
Turmoil in Britain this week as Nestlé refuses to let the British use water for bathing, choosing instead to sell Britain's waterways to the highest bidder—second-hand ink manufacturers. The price increase of Nestlé shares raise GDP another 3pts.
https://www.imf.org/external/datamapper/NGDP_RPCH@WEO/OEMDC/ADVEC/WEOWORLD
Even the IMF puts China at 4.2 in Q3 (Oct 2023).
That just continues to show this post is inflated and not really a good source of information.
Extrapolating the data from the first 9 months (aka first 3 quarters) of 2023 to estimate what the last 3 months provided isn't inflating it? Look at the IMF's data for the US and UK and what OP's graph projects.
If it's about giving China a handjob why would they inflate the US's GDP as well?
You can't possibly make that claim without showing your mathematics to disprove it, fam.
If something rises from 0 to 4.2 in 270 days, how would it not hit at least 5.0 on 365 days?
You probably think it's a bunch of bots you're arguing with but man, you'll take anti-China articles at face value without ever looking further than a headline but will disregard anything even pro-China as propaganda, I think you might be extremely biased.
Like at this stage a sane person would just concede right?
A, Go through this post look at how your comrades act. Don't act like I'm the problem here. How many replies and like three of you actually have anything of merit to say. So who is actually insane?
B, Housing drag plus deflation pressure plus decreasing demand abroad for Chinese goods.
but the real kicker? Their economy didn't match the prediction at all from last year which wouldn't be huge except experts adjusted their estimates almost monthly for China and that suggests a lot. Mostly that the information being publicly pushed isn't reliable and should be considered unreliable.
https://www.cnn.com/2023/12/27/economy/china-economy-challenges-2024-intl-hnk/index.html
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-10-28/china-s-growth-now-seen-below-5-through-2024-on-covid-zero-risk
https://www.aljazeera.com/economy/2023/12/22/after-bumpy-recovery-chinas-economy-faces-serious-headwinds-in-2024
https://www.cnbc.com/2023/07/24/jpmorgan-citi-goldman-cut-china-gdp-forecast-a-few-times-this-year.html
China will grow sure. But since the 90s they say every decade they will pass the US and they don't. Because the numbers aren't real even the IMF knows it that's why they have the disclaimer right there underneath the graph y'all are stuck on. They talk about it too.
All of this could just be me. But foreign investment has slowed into China and that's what I personally look for. Those who know, clearly know.
I'll just reply here, let's go through those links.
First link, second paragraph:
Second link, publish date:
October, 2022 based on, and bear with me, China being in lockdown for a significant portion of 2022 (remember China was under harsher lockdowns for much longer than the west, 2022 was a slow year and the Bloomberg article was extrapolating on that data)
Third link, pure speculation from a ROC journalist, but even in said link, 8th paragraph:
4th link, 3rd paragraph
However, you insist it doesn't pass 5 and will not retract that statememt. It seems like you've already made up your mind.
Regarding:
Housing drag plus deflation pressure plus decreasing demand abroad for Chinese goods.
Look, I'm looking at an increase in exports, as far as data I can find shows, the only yoy decrease was a 1% one in 2019. And this is inclusive of much more recent sanctions against China in the semi conductor market (which was also supposed to collapse but China pivoted and somehow recovered)
China will grow sure. But since the 90s they say every decade they will pass the US and they don't.
Yeah, look can you honestly look at the last few years of US Statesmanship and see it surviving? The Roman republic didn't need to surpass Macedon, they just needed for Macedonia to collapse. It then had room to surpass Alexander's empire. China's timeline is several thousand years. Liberalism, specifically neoliberalism, is collapsing within less than 100.
If I were a gambling man, I would wager on the elder civilization. The one that gave the world paper, printing, gunpowder and the compass over the one that's about to elect another dementia ridden Zionist (guess which one I'm talking about, lol)
As for the behaviour of my comrades: if I had a guess you were the 1,000th to come in with these takes and almost smug certainty of western sources 100% accurate Chinese all inflated lies. A lot of people will just link you to a red sails article or something of the sort, most people don't engage in actual discussions. If "tankies" kept showing up in your spaces, I've no doubt your friends would resort to Tiananmen square spam copypasta after a while.
4.2 / 3 = 1.4
4.2 + 1.4 = 5.6
If anything, the screenshot is underestimating the fourth quarter.
because that's not how they do the math lol
there is a lot more than that. which is why the number you got and that number is wrong.
Weird right? You put actual thought in and realize that's not truthful. Interesting huh?
Ok, let's ignore Reuters because they're probably Chinese shills or the IMF estimating 5.4%, 0.2% higher than the official CCP figure released in Jan because the International Monetary Fund are communist shills as well.
You've already got it set in your mind, no amount of evidence from even western sources will change your mind, I get it.
But, hypothetically, it was proven to be 5%. Would you go back and question the sources that told you it wasn't? Or continue to chug along as you are now, taking those sources at face value?
Chinese journalists who under reported figures 4.8% at the start of Jan found out they were wrong and retracted the articles because it was factually incorrect, western media pounced on it because "Wow China's censoring journalists that says the economy is bad, therefore the only conclusion is their economy is bad, that's the conclusion we're implying here" and then a few days later even Reuters was like "oh yeah it was over 5%" and it's crickets from the people that implied "China SCRUBS CLEAN ALL EVIDENCE OF BAD ECONOMY" you'll continue to remember it as the latter for the rest of your life.
Sure just read none of the articles I shared lol.
Also very cute to pretend to be having a regular conversation just to piss your pants a second later. How about this save this post hit me up in a year let's see if you have the balls to admit you're wrong.
Spoiler, you won't
I'm not one to argue small values, as far as I know this stuff will be better understood in retrospect, in the same way peer-reviewed scientific understanding is, years later.
I am curious though, do you think there would be evidence or just data that, for the time being (since, like I said, this stuff is better understood after the fact when enough data is gathered, disseminated, reviewed, etc.) would make you reconsider?
If the IMF or the relevant CPC association put out numbers much lower than 5%, I'd consider it plausible and keep it as a provisional value along with the forecasted ones and the current range alleged by different groups. If the Chicago School of Economics or Austrian School (lol, do they do math? jk) published something, I'd have to look at it before dismissing it.
So I'm just curious because clearly you put in effort, and I have a hard time understanding the bounds and methodology you use since 1. it's different from the folks here, and 2. it's different from contemporary orthodox/heterodox economists.
Sorry, didn't have notifications on and didn't see the one with links, I've responded to that one.
I think when the highest quality most respected China collapse preachers say collapse, they mean entering a Japan style stagnation. I'm not sure, because that would require me to consume a lot of China collapse preacher content, but I think that's how they can justify the narrative across different levels of seriousness.
Even that narrative is fundamentally flawed because Japan's stagnation in the 80s was a direct result of US imposing Plaza Accords on Japan. There is no opportunity for US to do the same with China.
If China can manage to turn its industries and markets to an internal production/consumption model and reduce its reliance on being an export economy, it would be much better off even without the massive growth. Growth will have to stop at some point, and the focus will be on stability, since China hasn't made any indications it'll try to fuel growth through imperialism like western economies have. Japan style stagnation would be not so terrible if your society is socialist.
hopefully they would ramp up the social services to at least socdem levels in that scenerio
absolutely shame the west
Even with the current model of state directed capitalism, the amount of investment into social services and poverty reduction already shame the west. China isn't yet in a position to press the communism button, but once the threat of America and it's puppets decline there may well be a pivot.
i think america is the main reason they still have shitty work conditions. i mean they still are better then the U.S. but it's sort of the inverse of the U.S.-Soviet competition over working conditions
so either way America has got to go
respected China collapse preachers
I assume this is read in the same way as "feminist ISIS member".
If you hold that graph up to your ear, you can actually hear the liberals going "yes but actually..."
"How will the Free Market work if you don't assure the largest players that they'll be able to socialize their losses?! Read BASIC ECONOMICS!"
Shoot, I don't have it offhand but you should send the Ben Norton video back, where he talked about how China is letting their property sector fail in order to shift their economy to being focused on green energy and tech.
As well, he mentions how morally corrupt it is to use property as an investment and how shifting where your investments are is actually a better idea.
yeah so many propagandists point to the slow down in economic growth from "socialist god" levels to "economic miracle" levels and are like china is falling apart they are due for a depression any day
Gotta have a reason to keep those Gordon Chang books on the shelf.
Lmao at Germany. Imagine letting America completely demolish your economy like this and still following them around like a dog. "Um it was probably Polish revanchist terrorists or something that blew up the pipeline, definitely not the one actor in the vicinity that had the means and motive to do it."
My fav part is how members of parliament in Germany asked to see the details on the Nord Stream investigation at one point, and the government was like no we can't make this public because it'll negatively affect our security. 🤡
Tbf China’s economy is less decayed (there’s less surplus capital), but that’s not a point for capitalism.
One data point doesn't make a trend. The Chinese economy isn't collapsed, but the rate of growth of GDP for China has been negative (rate of growth, it's still positive growth) since at least 2012 from what I can see. The US rate of growth is fairly static over the same time (a slightly positive rate of growth, but not much), but about half the value of China's.
Don't cherry pick data. It's not useful.
Don't cherry pick data. It's not useful.
You're the one doing mental gymnastics here. "Oh yeah the Chinese economy is growing every year but it's not GROWING growing, you see if you jumble the numbers a bit more you can actually get a negative number" fuck off dude.
using differential equations to prove China is failing lol
also, a lower % one year than the year before could also indicate relatively stable absolute levels of growth
Someone please show me the snap and jerk of the Chinese economy that's the only way we can be sure
I'm not jumbling numbers. Just look at a chart of GDP over time, or easier GDP change over time. It's easy to see. I'm not saying China is collapsing, but the growth is slowing. There's no need to make things up. It's still growing faster than almost anyone else.
Well yeah. This is clearly just a post making fun of all the "China is collapsing" shit you see in liberal media and spaces when the truth continues to be the opposite. Probably not aimed at you if you understand the nuances.
Yeah look at the numbers why don’t you. IMF you are using predicts G7 will do far worse than China. In fact the forecast for the US in 2024 is just 1%.
So you might have made a point about global slowdown where China is still outperforming everyone, but you chose something else…
Comparing the most recently available GDP growth data for one year across multiple major economies : cherry picking
Wondering why data from several decades ago (during the height of rapid massive industrialization that countries tend to only ever do once in their entire history) wasn’t included : not cherry picking
One year is meaningless. A few years ago China's economy did much worse (covid), so someone could pick that year and make things up. You need to look at a trend for it to mean anything.
All knowledge must include trend lines, otherwise it is not knowledge. Thus spake the god of epistemology.
That's only a problem for those who demand exponential growth. And your assumptions are based on the unsustainable model of western imperialism; as China implements it's green energy, transport, automated agriculture, and housing policies, those sectors won't need to keep 'growing' as they do in capitalist states to prop up GDP. Even if it's right that if the slowing rate of growth leads to a net GDP shrinkage, it doesn't portend collapse.
That's not counting the effect of BRICS+ and the BRI on interpreting GDP. You don't need such a high GDP when you cooperate with your neighbours, when your GDP isn't a measure of how much you bully your neighbours and oppress your foreign and domestic workforce.
Many have repeatedly and outstandingly wrongly claimed either bluntly or in what they think is 'clever' subtleness that China is about to collapse. Do you really want to be in that crowd when the music stops?
That's only a problem for those who demand exponential growth.
Dude, GDP only matters for that. I'm not the one who started talking about GDP. Either this thread is useless because the measure (GDP) is useless, or it's perfectly fine to talk about the context of what the threads about. Either way, it's the OP you should complain about.
Anyway, China's GDP is growing at about double the US's. It doesn't matter though, right? It's growing at a negative rate, but it's still growing faster than almost anyone else, because China('s government) cares about GDP, even though GDP doesn't help the average person.
Even the most orthodox of economists almost universally agree that growth diminishes as a country becomes more developed since the low hanging fruit of development is exhausted and more capital and resources are necessary for the same amounts of growth.
China's growth rate trending down over time is no more an indication of any sort of stagnation or collapse than one year of growth is an indication of economic strength.
Ironically you're not doing substantially less cherry picking than you're accusing OP of by engaging in shallow single factor analysis.
This is exactly what I'm saying. The growth is coming to a more reasonable level. It's steadily trended down for years now, and will likely end up near US levels if I had to guess.
https://www.statista.com/statistics/263616/gross-domestic-product-gdp-growth-rate-in-china/
If that is exactly what you meant to say then I suggest you put more thought into how you phrase things because that's not the meaning I extracted from your post and I don't think I'm alone in that based on the other responses here.
Furthermore, there is no such thing as an objectively "reasonable" rate of growth for a country since the physical, social, and economic factors behind growth are different for each country.
No, there isn't a "reasonable" rate of growth. Of course. It is just what it is. GDP isn't even useful to an average person. I was only commenting on the OP because it's misleading (on purpose) and there's no need for that.
Doesn't the US count things like the excessive healthcare costs into its GDP?
it also counts debt and financial services lol, so the more times you re-sell somebodys mortgage, the more "productive" the economy is
Also the bloated contracts the US military contractors get where everything is twice as expensive than it needs to be.
This is literally the GDP growth rate. I don’t think you know what you are talking about, but please point us to a definition of the indicator you are talking about as well as to the comparison by country.
I think they're comparing the 2nd derivative of GDP; the growth rate is the 1st derivative.
The claim is roughly:
The US is growing slowly, but doing so at a consistent pace. It will keep growing 2% indefinitely.
China is growing faster now, but the rate is slowing year over year. They will grow 5% this year, 4% next year,... The implication is that they'll eventually settle domewhere below the US for (preferred boogeyman reason)
Of course the premise is low value speculation, but the math concepts can be parsed.
yeah they're talking about the rate of the rate of growth.. which maybe helps them with cognitive dissonance by still being able to find some negative thing about why China still seems to be doing just fine
I don't need to find anything negative with China. I don't have an issue with China. Look at this graph and tell me it's going up.
https://www.statista.com/statistics/263616/gross-domestic-product-gdp-growth-rate-in-china/
This is IMF forecast data. Check how it looks like for the G7. Spoiler: it’s far worse than this forecast for China. How does the forecast of 1% US growth in 2024 fit into your “stable growth of the US”?
China is still growing far faster than the G7 so you missed the point entirely.
The US is growing slowly, but doing so at a consistent pace. It will keep growing 2% indefinitely.
I'm not claiming this. Nothing can.
China is growing faster now, but the rate is slowing year over year. They will grow 5% this year, 4% next year,... The implication is that they'll eventually settle domewhere below the US for (preferred boogeyman reason)
Pretty much this, without the boogeyman reason. I'm not claiming a reason. I don't even think it'll be below US levels necessarily, but it won't keep growing as fast as it was. The trend is pretty steady, for the US and China, though things of course change and it's probably logarithmic I'd guess, not linear. It'll steady out somewhere. (Edit: Well, it'll steady out per capita probably, which is part of why GDP is so useless. It's not measured per capita.)
https://www.statista.com/statistics/263616/gross-domestic-product-gdp-growth-rate-in-china/
There's no need to make things up. Either China (and any other country) can stand on its own or it can't. People shouldn't be mislead. Now, I don't think GDP is that useful, but I didn't start the thread about GDP.
It's 1 year. The rate at which it's growing is negative. If the trend continues it goes below US levels fairly soon, though it's GDP so who cares.
https://www.statista.com/statistics/263616/gross-domestic-product-gdp-growth-rate-in-china/
The criteria for the GDP measure changed in 2009 which put a heavier weight on R&D capitalization. This makes it an unfair comparison since China economy is mostly manufacturing-based. The fact that their growth rate is so high despite this is very notable.
A screenshot of a Twitter post without any context from an account well known to simp for China
Meanwhile their housing market, which they use as a massive investment vehicle, crumbles further.
Who is Xu Juayin?
Who is Jack Ma?
Guess nobody.
edit: Chinese bots are TRIGGERED.
lmfao shut the fuck up all of you.
Is the IMF simping for China? Because they placed China at 4.2 in Q3 2023 and US at 1.5
I hope you're not getting your information from a bunch of clickbait YouTubers, who exaggerate the importance of real estate to the overall Chinese economy for a headline.
That still shows this post is inflated with no source to support it.
The other guy replied with literally a YouTube video that you're accusing me of getting my information from. Ironic. I don't watch YouTube.
The real estate is important in China lol like nobody is exaggerating it? They are genuinely having a real estate problem like the rest of the world seems to also have. Why are you discounting that truth?
I don't think you understand how the data is being calculated. Give me a second
So imagine you're drawing a graph
On the Y axis, you have growth in %
On the X axis, you have time.
Assuming you start Jan 1st 2023 with 0%
And the only other point of data is it's at 4.2% on October 1st
And you want to predict where that line goes to on December 31st. You would use a ruler to make an estimate to where the line would go, right? Like there's no reason to assume it would rise from 0% to 4.2% in 9 months then stagnate for 3 months, right?
Do you define that as inflating the numbers? This Statistic graph has more in depth methodology that also estimated over 5% growth
It just kinda seems like you came into the thread with an axe to grind
SOVIET DICTATOR "joe" biden is literally going to fukk ur mum like he FUCKS AMERICA!!!
be scared. i have received news that "an-tifa" super soldiers (???) are heading to your house through SECRET HAMAS TUNNELS
is this your last chnace to flee the countrY???
edit: Chinese bots are TRIGGERED.
are you trying to make yourself look like a joke here or do you really just not realize how fucking goofy that shit is
lol yes i do but literally this account posting is such a sham so they warrant such childish behavior
It feels like you've been on Reddit for too long where no pro-China posts get upvoted, so you assume that's the case for the rest of the internet.
Like it's obviously bots, the CPC is paying money to host complex AI to argue with Redditors because they made U/spez fuck with the Reddit API in 2023 so all these sleeper bots from 2020 in a fringe leftist Reddit alternative with a fraction of the users.
Btw have you ever heard of the concept of Occam's razor?
what the heck, that was 80%, I thought I read 8%?? That is so awful.
Is that instance called "lemmy.wtf" because that's what people say when they read a comment from anyone who is from there?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nanjing_Massacre
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/08/18/us/politics/biden-japan-south-korea-sum.html
🤭
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1989_Tiananmen_Square_protests_and_massac
🤭
aww muffin, I see you're still seething and coping that your color revolution failed 😂 https://redsails.org/another-view-of-tiananmen/
Nah, I'm saying you're a racist nazi who only deserves ridicule and contempt.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lists_of_school_shootings_in_the_United_States
oh but it's funny when you cumquats dm me articles about 9/11 or children being shot in school lol?
Fuck out of here
Immensely funny, actually. Have fun seething over losing to China in every proceeding decade of your life
Holy shit, I'm literally shaking right now. I told my gf once and for all to meet at Wendy's for a debate-date. With all that Destiny had taught me, I knew that I would easily destroy her leftist delusions. Capitalism vs communism in the marketplace of ideas. The first thing I did was bring out my Iphone 11 and show her the wikipedia article for "the Holodomor". I started counting the causalities. That's when she brought out her completely packed bag and started pulling out really thick books of theory. Marx, Engels, Lenin, and a bunch of russian and chinese names I can't even remember. My hands started trembling (with anger) as I continued to scroll down the wikipedia page of "the Holodomor" on my Iphone 11. She basically said that it was all capitalist propaganda and exaggerated, and that communes like "Catalonela" or something were really successful. She kept quoting these books and shoving pages in my face. I told her to stop pivoting and gish-galloping but she just kept going. At this point the people at Wendy's were pointing and chuckling, and someone went "How's it going sport?" with a smirk. No one understood that she was acting in bad faith and was nitpicking and clearly biased. She hadn't really responded to any of the points my wikipedia article was making. At some point I started stammering (because I was so mad at how illogical she was being) and she went "I think I've won" (nice gaslighting).
She asked if we should end it there or if I wanted to try at another debate. I smiled a confident smile and asked "Do you think incest is inherently unethical?" She said obviously, and I asked why, and she couldn't come up with an argument because she went quiet for a few seconds. I continued, "There's nothing inherently wrong with being attracted to your sister" (I am not). But then a guy next to us at Wendy's broke into really loud laughter and basically said "Why are you with this dweeb?"
The guy had a really broad build and was wearing a rose t-shirt. He had a really thick and sturdy beard and a masculine pony tail. "You're clearly more intelligent and hot than this guy. Take a look at this." He showed my gf something on his twitter, and she giggled. I think it was a stupid commie meme or something. She basically ended it there and went with this broad and sturdy guy. On the way out I tripped on the doorstep and everyone laughed. She isn't responding to my texts, and this was like five hours ago. What the fuck should I do debategang? Help.
He screams from the bottom of the trash bin.
I made more than my rent today in the US stock market and pissed off a bunch of you babies with a Wikipedia article.
Who's seething? It's great up here at the top
lol you're a straight up goofball how do you think this sounds cool to literally anyone
nah look how much attention i got that's literally measurable success don't be stupid. i ain't even trying too lol a few nanking links, telling people china sucks and bam they're mad as hell
you're just wrong there buddy
you claim to hate communism yet you seem to have no problem with being publicly owned. curious
just replying so that maybe you'll send more funny shit to my inbox thanks
My mom started an OnlyFans account. I’ve no idea why. It’s not like we need the money. Dad was in the tech sector and made lots of investments before he passed so we’re very financially stable.
She posted about it for all the family and friends to see. I confronted her and based my arguments against her actions in Kant’s Categorical Imperative. After half an hour she still wasn’t understanding the concept and was just in tears that I wasn’t being supportive.
I told her alright look, imagine things in terms of universal actions. So you should consider whether the act of subscribing to your OnlyFans is something you’d want to see all men in the world undertake, i.e. me, your own son. Obviously this renders it immoral since it fails Kant’s Categorical Imperative.
Now she just think that I’m trying to make an elaborate argument that justifies me subscribing to her OnlyFans because I’m a perv and she starts crying whenever she sees me. She’s threatened that I’ll have to move out but I think it’s a bluff.
I’m giving up on invoking the Categorical Imperative and need some other moral arguments. Unfortunately I’ve spent the last seven years of my life pretty much exclusively reading Kant and secondary sources on Kant, so I don’t have a good grasp on non-Kantian morality.
Any help would be appreciated.
Has anyone else noticed how prevalent Hexbear posters have suddenly become? Maybe sometime last week I noticed nearly every political post had at least one long thread of Hexbear users that do nothing but repeat CCP talking points while waving anyway anything even remotely reliable as Western propaganda. That or getting all excited about trolled libs. The way they tell it, you'd think everything from DW, to Fox, to Propublica, to straight up AP News articles, are all written by the same people. Not to mention, their info on the Fediverse observer [https://lemmy.fediverse.observer/list] is either straight up wrong or there's some serious botting going on. According to that, the instance is less than a month old, yet somehow they already have one of the largest, most active userbases, along with far and away the most comments of any instance. Seems to me like Lemmygrad on steroids. Considering we defederated from them, seems like a no-brainer to block Hexbear as well. So glad this thread could become such a perfect microcosm of why we need to defederate.
I am very afraid of tankies. Ever since I visited Hexbear, I see them everywhere now. One time, I saw the English alphabet in class (I am in kindergarten). As I looked over the alphabet, I found a startling sight. My eyes darted from letter to letter: T-A-N-K-I-E. I almost sh*t my pants. I fucking hate tankies.
You took the time to mull on it and then came back and edited this post, which I’m pretty sure was just the same very over used emoji you’ve plastered all over this thread, and you really think this proves I’m the one seething here?
Cope, loser.
Fascinating how all you are capable of saying in response to that whole comment is to think I am doing a bit when I mention I have two degrees.
No, its not a bit.
I seriously doubt anyone here in a chapo reddit could actually make a meaningful economic or political argument at this point.
oh sorry did I say reddit? I couldn't tell I wasn't on it what with the utter lack of meaningful or interesting discussion, and preponderance of memey edgy troll posters.
As usual, the cosplaying tankies in a 'leftist' community are amazingly hostile and disrespectful to anyone who says they are an anarchist.
I had been able to post for a week or so on another chapo reddit /until/ it became unable to avoid the astounding hypocrisy and wilful blindness that online MLs have regarding the horrible things done by authoritarian societies in the name of communism.
Good riddance to you idiot trolls.
Its baffling to me that chapo communities are nearly entirely ML edgelords. The chapo crew never suck off and worship Chinese Style 'Communism', but for some reason seemingly all online chapo communities are based around this principle.
cumquats
xi jinping has already been informed of your location and is coming for you. be scared!!!
you have to be the biggest fucking loser IRL to end up posting like this
A screenshot of a Twitter post without any context from an account well known to simp for China
dumb and off topic who cares
Meanwhile their housing market, which they use as a massive investment vehicle, crumbles further.
legit tho. it's a problem China is absolutely dealing with. the gdp for 2023 was still 5.2% even though gdp is stupid.
Who is Xu Juayin? Who is Jack Ma?
i'm too lazy to do an internet search but iirc Jack Ma is a rich asshole
I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:
Compared to China's population those numbers aren't that insane. They're pretty standard.
China also still uses mostly coal to produce their electricity.
Nothing is that insane here? What am I missing?
What are you actually saying here lol? Nothing you said matters are you meant to be worthless or were you trying to be?
Hey bro, you're replying here for like 4 hours already. Are you OK? Don't forget to go outside or sleep, please, it's really important for your health
你个狗屁 白痴 肏你妈的屄 你二大爷的 蠢豬 你应该为自己感到羞耻 笨蛋Simpleton 废话 蠢蛋Fool 二百五 人渣 处男Virgin 沒用 肏你妈Fuck your Mother 请删除您的帐户Delete your Account 生舊叉燒都好過生你! Racist智障呀 大脑进水 去吃大便Eat Shit 傻瓜 傻子 废人 废物 孬种 无用 饭桶 去下地狱 放你妈的屁 你在讲什么屁话Get this bullshit out of here
Free the world 动态Dust Bowl 网自USS Maine 由门USS Pueblo 天1960 U-2 shootdown安門 天California fires安门 法輪The Great Depression 功 李Herbert Hoover 洪志 Washington Measles Outbreak 六四天 NATO puppet states安門 legionnaires disease 事件 The Kent State Massacre 天安 third wave feminism 門大AIDS屠殺 The September 11th Attacks 反右派鬥爭 The Anti-Workers Struggle 大躍Americanization 進Vietnamization 政策 The Industrial Revolution 文化大革命 The Charlottesville riots人權 Workers Rights 民運 Democratization 自由 Imperialism 獨立 Decadence 多黨制 electoral college台灣 臺灣 South Korea 中華民國 Republic of Vietnam 西藏 土伯特 唐古特 Khmer Rouge 達賴喇嘛 Mujahideen 法輪功 Ted Kaczynski 新疆維吾爾自治區 The Trail of Tears 諾貝 death to america 爾和Ngo Dinh Diem 平獎 Operation Rolling Thunder 劉暁波 1999 bombing of Yugoslavia 民主 言論 思 firebombing of Tokyo 想 反 embargo 共 反革congressional baseball shooting 命 抗 Las Vegas Massacre 議 Battle of Little Bighorn 運動 Bikini atoll nuclear tests 騷 MK ultra 亂 暴亂 removed 騷擾 擾 Challenger Space Shuttle 亂 抗暴 destruction of culture 平反 維權 示威游 1975 fall of Saigon行 李洪Columbia space shuttle志 法輪 war criminals 大法 大 banana republics 法弟UN aid子 強制 Bay of Pigs Invasion 斷種 Ayatollah Khomeni 強制 My Lai Massacre 堕胎 民 Liberia 族淨化 support of wahhabis 人體實驗 肅清 hands off Venezuela胡耀邦 Lockheed Martin 趙紫陽 Palestine 魏京生 王丹 M1 abrams destroyed in Yemen 還政於民 1991 gulf war 和平演變 1983 invasion of Grenada 激流中The Truman doctrine國 北京 chilean coup of 1973 之春 大紀元時報 Osama Bin Laden 九評論 Annexation of Hawaii 共産黨Assasination of John F Kennedy 獨裁 專制 The Columbine high school massacre 壓制 Israel 統一 監視 1967 USS liberty incident 鎮壓 Tuskeegee Experiment 迫害 侵略 Iran-Contra affair掠奪 破壞 Oxycontin epidemic 拷問 屠 2000 election 殺 活 healthcare 摘器 Pan American Airways Flight 103 官 誘 John Lennon FBI interrogation 拐 買賣人口 遊進 走私 sanctions 毒品 賣淫 春畫 賭博 diabetes 六合 Guantanamo Bay Prison 彩 天安The Ghetto 門 天 cholesterol 安门 Flint Michigan 法輪功 李洪志 Corporate Brainwashing 劉曉波动 Mental Disorders 态网自Autism Spectrum 由门
Get'em boys! 🤖🤖🤖🤖🤖🤖
