Don't try and kid me, I've worked in the same chapter as you, the results would speak for themselves and we wouldn't be having this conversation. My concerns do ultimately come down to "they're old", but that's clearly not what I'm saying when I cite each specific issue mentioned above. My concerns come down to "they're old" because they're clearly old and unable to enforce the dynamic change that ought to be coming from the leadership of an organization like this at this point in history. If they were old but able to be the helmsman of a dynamic and groundbreaking organization then I wouldn't have these concerns, let them be as old as they want if they can do their job.