• Hadmhd@lemmygrad.ml
      hexagon
      ·
      9 months ago

      Yes, but still they portray India as a holy country to counter china's development in an 'authoritarian' state.

      • Hello_Kitty_enjoyer [none/use name]
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        India's always been portrayed in the west as a "holy country" as far back as the 1960s

        They like to portray it as a "democracy" despite the fascist violence towards certain tribes/castes and Muslims

          • Hello_Kitty_enjoyer [none/use name]
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            China wasn't an important rival of the US back in the 1960s.
            In fact that's when the Sino-Soviet split started happening

            • Hadmhd@lemmygrad.ml
              hexagon
              ·
              9 months ago

              sino soviet split happened due to ideological problems and intolerance towards various philosophical aspects of Marxism , like Stalin tito split happened due to market oriented socialism in the initial years of Yugoslavia which Stalin rejected , similarly chinese side were more aggressive towards fundamental issues of class struggle in which soviet sought out a holistic picture of the world . Soviets worked with Indians (centrists at that time) , Nasser and others where Mao sought out fierce ideological dogmatic positions in 3 world theory and labeling Soviets as social imperialism when Soviets invaded Czechoslovakia . Though it doesn't matter much nowadays , Soviets are gone and China has gone through tremendous change , from Deng reforms , corruption , markets , businesses , SEZ , low wages to standard wages to innovation and then high tech development .

              • Hello_Kitty_enjoyer [none/use name]
                ·
                9 months ago

                anyway, my point is that the "holy" image of India in western culture is as old as the 1960s, woodstock, hippies, and has little to do with libs "pushing that image"