Show

you don't need it!

you don't need it!

  • OgdenTO [he/him]
    hexbear
    13
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I don't get it. Shouldn't it be at least optional?

    Edit: now that I read it, the ban is on municipalities mandating these protections.

    • @DamarcusArt@lemmygrad.ml
      hexbear
      4
      2 months ago

      Maybe I misunderstood it a bit, but it seems like any business that goes above the minimum required by state law could be punished for it.

      • OgdenTO [he/him]
        hexbear
        15
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        No it looks like it's a ban on regulatory authorities from mandating heat protections on companies that go above state mandates. It reads to me like companies could still provide them, but are under no obligation to provide anything above the state mandates minimum. The headline is poorly written.

        When they say agencies they mean local government bodies.

          • OgdenTO [he/him]
            hexbear
            6
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            I think its safe to assume that companies (in Florida, using exploitative labor already) will spend as little as possible on the safety of their employees