"we have Dahir insaat at home" ass monorail

  • flan [they/them]
    hexbear
    12
    1 month ago

    if it’s on one rail you could have them pass each other without needing to build a second set of tracks or relying on sidings to exist

    • Maoo [none/use name]
      hexbear
      3
      1 month ago

      The concept art shows both rails being used by a single car but still having the balancing problem. Worst of both worlds.

      • jack [he/him, comrade/them]M
        hexbear
        4
        1 month ago

        That's a little deployable arm that presumably allows it to travel faster. When it needs to pass, that can come up.

        • Maoo [none/use name]
          hexbear
          3
          1 month ago

          Oh God that's even worse. Guaranteed collisions via an unnecessary slow-moving part that is assumed to always function correctly.

          Rail comes in pairs already so that you only have to build one engineered area, tunnel, bridge, etc. This is a bazinga idea.

          • Chronicon [they/them]
            hexbear
            3
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            if you read the article, the bar is a safety mechanism for the prototype/testing stage and would not be in place on the production run.

            these test models are equipped with extendible "catching devices" that keep them from tipping over in the event of a mishap

            • Maoo [none/use name]
              hexbear
              3
              1 month ago

              Yes I read the article and that ambiguous language doesn't challenge what I said.

              This is a really bad idea. The kind cooked up by academic transportation grifters looking to take a pile of money from the government to do a bad idea with the right buzzwords. This is how the bazinga industrial complex works.