Owl [he/him] to urbanism • 2 months agoxkcd falls for "just one more lane"imagemessage-square25 fedilinkarrow-up1116file-text
arrow-up1116imagexkcd falls for "just one more lane"Owl [he/him] to urbanism • 2 months agomessage-square25 Commentsfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareTomorrow_Farewell [any, they/them]hexbear12·edit-22 months agoWe are cooking with manifolds EDIT: wait, no, WTH am I saying? At the forking point, that thing is not locally homeomorphic to R^n for any natural n. Time to commit eepy. link
minus-squarepeeonyou [he/him]hexbear4·2 months agoyes this arrangement of words seems like it would make sense to someone, i agree link
minus-squaregchromodynamicshexbear3·2 months agoIt is if you delete the forking point no? So just make it fork at Chaitin's constant or some other real number no one will notice missing. link
minus-squareTomorrow_Farewell [any, they/them]hexbear2·2 months ago It is if you delete the forking point no? If. link
We are cooking with manifoldsEDIT: wait, no, WTH am I saying? At the forking point, that thing is not locally homeomorphic to R^n for any natural n.
Time to commit eepy.
yes this arrangement of words seems like it would make sense to someone, i agree
It is if you delete the forking point no? So just make it fork at Chaitin's constant or some other real number no one will notice missing.
If.