The primary goal of the war in Ukraine was not really against Russia, but against Europe
This seems to be a confident but unsubstantiated claim. Like, what even is the argument here?
Europe, the US’s true competitor
And this is outright silly, considering that NATO Europe has effectively been under US control for close to a century now.
The power that is an actual competitor in this regard is the PRC.
Marx has not failed to consider anime and manga.
The only actual serious way of dealing with inflation in the long term is price controls, which westerners have been conditioned to think of as awful.
She fell down from the coconut tree
From the owner of companies that make peeing rockets, self-immolating cars, and a disaster social media site.
The new version of 'SJW'.
Also, it's rather silly how they obviously try to pretend that measures like trying to hire more marginalised people somehow means that better candidates aren't hired when we know that what happens otherwise is that the better candidates from the pools of marginalised groups aren't hired.
And Mt. Rushmore requires fascism.
One NATO soldier gets the rifle, and the other gets the mag.
Unfortunately, no. I am not available at that time.
I could give the thing a try and see if things fit. However, there is the question of I scheduling.
Depending on whether or not this is a dungeon crawler or a more social campaign (I do not want to join a dungeon crawler, I'm sorry; given the rather strict necessity of filling particular combat roles, it does seem like your game is such), and depending on the schedule.
Capitalism and guaranteed housing.
first they came for the trans soldiers and I did not speak out because I was
not a trans soldieran egg
Your humours are out of balance. We need to do humour replacement therapy to make you more sanguine.
Asking this as somebody who wants the PRC to succeed in today's world.
Specifically when people try to claim that the PRC' economy is socialist (as opposed to whether or not the government is), I do wonder what the argument for that point is? Because by the definitions of socialism/socialist societies/socialist economies that I have encountered, they all at the very least require elimination of the profit motive in the economy, which is obviously not the case in the case of the economy of the PRC, which literally features both companies owned by capitalists as well as co-ops, which operate on the profit motive.
I also do question people's understanding of the implications of planned economies vs privatised economies (not just capitalism, as private property can exist without caitalists having any dominance as a class) when it comes to workers' rights. It very much feels like people - even socialists - do not understand just how different those are and how much of a boon absence of private property is.
Iosif Bidon is not bi-done
That woman's name? Albert Einstein.
The galaxy will be pampered and cared for. Resistance is futile.