They think they can maybe sway Harris/the dems in general. Not unreasonable, seeing as IIRC they stand to potentially lose Michigan due to its (relatively) large muslim community which will likely have reduced turnout if her policies stay the same.
There is no convincing Trump or the repubs. Their voter base LOVES genocide. The only people who aren't onboard are some of the more extreme neo-nazis, who only disagree because they hate jews (I note here that Israel is not representative of all jews, and to claim so is anti-semitic, but these are neo-nazis) more than they hate muslims.
Edit: Oh okay. You think these protestors can stop Harris from funding Israel. But any leftist who points out how pointless it is to convince neoliberals to not do neoliberal things is... a neoliberal?
I know this is exceedingly hard for liberals to understand as the only thing they stand for is a status quo where they aren't challenged to think about anything beyond their order on the brunch menu, but there are many living, breathing, thinking human beings who are opposed to genocides and wish to see them stopped even if it's being executed and/or funded by the country they live in.
Oh no I don't because the existence of the American state itself (and its middle eastern colony Israel) is the actual issue, but you'll never see me getting upset at people attempting to stop a genocide even if I think the likelihood of their tactics succeeding is low because they, like me, are opposed to genocide.
That said their tactics are heightening the domestic contradictions in the US and drawing increased scrutiny and contributing towards real economic damage to Israel and any actions that lead to further destabilization of that country are exclusively good things so that it isn't able to sustain its global and decades-long campaign of terror on the world.
So what do you propose? You're sitting here attacking other people because they don't agree with fucking genocide and treating their protest as a non-issue in the grand scheme of things.
Don't think of it from a harm-reduction mindset. If YOU don't vote for somebody against genocide, then YOU lose to Trump. It's not on us for having a sense of what is right/wrong in the world.
I didn't say genocide was on you. Who here has said that??
And why shouldn't people view this in terms of harm reduction? The women in my life are scared shitless about a federal abortion ban, meanwhile so many leftist men I know completely ignore the abortion side of things and would sooner drape themselves in the Palestinian flag.
The women in my life are scared shitless about a federal abortion ban
so many leftist men I know completely ignore the abortion side of things and would sooner drape themselves in the Palestinian flag.
Hang on a second, if you're going to talk about the victims of the abortion ban, then it's only logically consistent to talk about the Palestinians being genocided, or the Palestinians whose families have bombs dropping on them. Comparing the victims of the abortion ban with not the victims of the genocide, but the people protesting it is being entirely deceptive.
So tell me, what of the Palestinians who have bombs dropping on them or on their families in Gaza; do you think they're not scared shitless? Do you think they're less scared than the women in your life?
What that individual is trying to say, but is too much of a coward to say it with their chest, is: The loss of life of a Palestinian is less concerning to me than the pain a white woman might endure.
so many leftist men I know completely ignore the abortion side of things and would sooner drape themselves in the Palestinian flag.
what spin doctor horseshit. If Amerikan women are cosigning genocide, then they're not my countryfolk, that's just the opps at that point. If you're going to position the comfort of Amerikan women versus the VERY LITERAL LIVES OF A SOVEREIGN NON-WHITE PEOPLE, then you deserve worse than what Gaza is getting. Genocide. Is not. An option.
It is entirely deceptive of this person to compare the victims in one case not versus the victims of the other, but the people protesting it. He knows if he compares the victims of the abortion ban versus an entire nation of people being starved to death and having bombs dropped on them the answer is fairly straightforward, so instead he compares the former with protesters against genocide. I can't even tell if this person knows they're being deceptive or if liberal brainworms are just this bad.
Nah, they know. I know they know because their last-ditch effort to vootshame invokes the age-old "none of you are actually Black or brown" peckerwood 4channer defense. Which is uniquely fucking horrific on its face, because it implies that they fundamentally can't envision why any white Amerikan would sooner show solidarity to the victims of genocide rather than the perpetrators, aides, and abettors.
And of course, y'know they were froggy to reply to everybody else, but I give them a yacht's worth of verifiably-Black critique of the candidate for Misleader-in-Chief and all a sudden it's crickets for an hour.
The internet made slavemasters way too comfortable with preaching genocide and colonialism and not getting capped for it.
EDIT: Two hours of a wait and they say NOTHING OF WORTH. No response to the critique given, just invoking hysteria to get around their fuckup. The master race, y'all...
Is there anything Kamala or Biden could do you would consider a valid reason not to vote for either of them? If Biden literally shot a Palestinian child in the face on stage, would that do it? What about SAing a Palestinian?
I ask because realistically speaking doing these would lose the Dems the election, and yet the genocide is exactly this except in the thousands. You'd never expect people to vote for either of these people if they publicly did something heinous, and yet the genocide is exactly something heinous, just not as in your face as the president doing it on stage.
Of course there is. If Harris shot a child and Trump said he'd shoot 10 children, who would you rather deal with? Or is that a hard choice you'd rather not make by avoiding voting?
It's like women's rights in relation to abortion. The vast majority of leftist men who seemingly don't care if a Trump admin results in a federal ban, and would rather spend their energy convincing themselves that they can dissuade Dems from supporting Israel.
Fix what you can but don't delude yourself into thinking you can fix what you can't, and then berate others for not partaking in your Sisyphean tasks.
If Harris shot a child and Trump said he'd shoot 10 children
Are you being deceptive on purpose or did you just misunderstand my question?
I didn't ask if Harris shot a child and Trump promised to shoot 10/more who would you rather deal with, I asked if Kamala simply shot a child, would that be enough for you not to vote for her? Literally, right now, you switch on the news and see every channel telling you Kamala just shot a Palestinian child in the face and you see the video of it, meanwhile Trump is making zero claims about shooting any children; do you still vote for her? To reiterate my question: Is there anything Kamala or Biden could do you would consider a valid reason not to vote for either of them?
The point of the question is that you and I both know she'd lose either every Dem voter or the vast majority of them, meanwhile an actual genocide is taking place where many, many more are dying and the same people who'd stop voting for her because of her shooting a child wouldn't care about the tens of thousands who've died sight unseen.
Let me put a second question up as well: Why should Biden or Kamala bother going to any more debates? Who cares? Literally as a voter you have a choice between either Kamala or Trump, and you're supposed to vote for Kamala, so why should she bother going to the debates? What are the Dem voters going to do about it, not vote for her and get Trump instead?
I'll even give you the answer to the second question: It's because Kamala's supposed to be trying to win; it's literally the same reason they're supposed to stop supporting the genocide. If they're not putting in the effort to win, how is that the fault of the people who won't vote for them? This goes back to the first question: shooting a child in the face would lose them the election (although the purpose of the first question is to point out people are more bothered with the evil they can see than the monumental evil they can't/won't).
and then berate others for not partaking in your Sisyphean tasks
And what task is that? Literally what task do you think people are berating you for? Everyone who is no longer voting for the Dems right now just want Kamala/Biden to stop supporting genocide, it's neither Sisyphean and nor is it directed at the people who are voting for Kamala, and as you were the one to bring it up, tell me: do you think Biden/Kamala ceasing support for genocide is Sisyphean? Simply not sending weapons at the very bare minimum?
And please don't try to be deceptive again; you can clearly see what I've posted here so don't pretend I asked a question I didn't.
I wouldn’t vote for either of them as I would not want to have “child murder” become something trivial that the Dems feel they can get away with
This is what I tell the libs I know: by far the biggest danger in this election is the "good guys" finding out there are zero consequences for doing an active genocide right out in the open.
The protestors want to pressure Harris/the dems so that they stop providing unlimited aid to Israel's ongoing genocide. Do you think that cutting aid to Israel would cost the dems more electorally than wholeheartedly enabling the genocide would?
Do you not perceive the entire Democrat establishment giving full throated support of a genocide while endorsing college kids getting the shit kicked out of them and moving to the right of Trump on immigration as the death knell of the party? Yeah the DNC might exist as an entity for the next 100 years but you're delusional if you think that there is anything there other than "But Trump is worse" to offer people. Harris has been abandoning any policies that even hint at being progressive at a break neck pace and has made it painfully clear to anyone actually paying attention that there is zero daylight between her and Biden. They can't even pretend to care about immigrants anymore and are falling back to "Well yes we haven't actually done anything to defend women or LGBTQ rights but at least we're not actively trying to murder them."
They think they can maybe sway Harris/the dems in general. Not unreasonable, seeing as IIRC they stand to potentially lose Michigan due to its (relatively) large muslim community which will likely have reduced turnout if her policies stay the same.
There is no convincing Trump or the repubs. Their voter base LOVES genocide. The only people who aren't onboard are some of the more extreme neo-nazis, who only disagree because they hate jews (I note here that Israel is not representative of all jews, and to claim so is anti-semitic, but these are neo-nazis) more than they hate muslims.
Sway them into what? A Trump victory?
Edit: Oh okay. You think these protestors can stop Harris from funding Israel. But any leftist who points out how pointless it is to convince neoliberals to not do neoliberal things is... a neoliberal?
I know this is exceedingly hard for liberals to understand as the only thing they stand for is a status quo where they aren't challenged to think about anything beyond their order on the brunch menu, but there are many living, breathing, thinking human beings who are opposed to genocides and wish to see them stopped even if it's being executed and/or funded by the country they live in.
So you believe it's possible for leftists to convince the Dems to stop funding Israel?
Personally, I think that just demonstrates a childlike naivety.
Oh no I don't because the existence of the American state itself (and its middle eastern colony Israel) is the actual issue, but you'll never see me getting upset at people attempting to stop a genocide even if I think the likelihood of their tactics succeeding is low because they, like me, are opposed to genocide.
That said their tactics are heightening the domestic contradictions in the US and drawing increased scrutiny and contributing towards real economic damage to Israel and any actions that lead to further destabilization of that country are exclusively good things so that it isn't able to sustain its global and decades-long campaign of terror on the world.
Your comment is a prime example of papertigery imperialist intimidation tactics
So what do you propose? You're sitting here attacking other people because they don't agree with fucking genocide and treating their protest as a non-issue in the grand scheme of things.
So what's your plan??
Don't think of it from a harm-reduction mindset. If YOU don't vote for somebody against genocide, then YOU lose to Trump. It's not on us for having a sense of what is right/wrong in the world.
I didn't say genocide was on you. Who here has said that??
And why shouldn't people view this in terms of harm reduction? The women in my life are scared shitless about a federal abortion ban, meanwhile so many leftist men I know completely ignore the abortion side of things and would sooner drape themselves in the Palestinian flag.
Hang on a second, if you're going to talk about the victims of the abortion ban, then it's only logically consistent to talk about the Palestinians being genocided, or the Palestinians whose families have bombs dropping on them. Comparing the victims of the abortion ban with not the victims of the genocide, but the people protesting it is being entirely deceptive.
So tell me, what of the Palestinians who have bombs dropping on them or on their families in Gaza; do you think they're not scared shitless? Do you think they're less scared than the women in your life?
What that individual is trying to say, but is too much of a coward to say it with their chest, is: The loss of life of a Palestinian is less concerning to me than the pain a white woman might endure.
Now the scared yanks have two options:
I: continue getting their rights taken away by the abusive system they worship
A: Turn on the system that betrayed them and work towards its destruction
I was in that situation once, I took option A.
what spin doctor horseshit. If Amerikan women are cosigning genocide, then they're not my countryfolk, that's just the opps at that point. If you're going to position the comfort of Amerikan women versus the VERY LITERAL LIVES OF A SOVEREIGN NON-WHITE PEOPLE, then you deserve worse than what Gaza is getting. Genocide. Is not. An option.
It is entirely deceptive of this person to compare the victims in one case not versus the victims of the other, but the people protesting it. He knows if he compares the victims of the abortion ban versus an entire nation of people being starved to death and having bombs dropped on them the answer is fairly straightforward, so instead he compares the former with protesters against genocide. I can't even tell if this person knows they're being deceptive or if liberal brainworms are just this bad.
Nah, they know. I know they know because their last-ditch effort to vootshame invokes the age-old "none of you are actually Black or brown" peckerwood 4channer defense. Which is uniquely fucking horrific on its face, because it implies that they fundamentally can't envision why any white Amerikan would sooner show solidarity to the victims of genocide rather than the perpetrators, aides, and abettors.
And of course, y'know they were froggy to reply to everybody else, but I give them a yacht's worth of verifiably-Black critique of the candidate for Misleader-in-Chief and all a sudden it's crickets for an hour.
The internet made slavemasters way too comfortable with preaching genocide and colonialism and not getting capped for it.
EDIT: Two hours of a wait and they say NOTHING OF WORTH. No response to the critique given, just invoking hysteria to get around their fuckup. The master race, y'all...
Is there anything Kamala or Biden could do you would consider a valid reason not to vote for either of them? If Biden literally shot a Palestinian child in the face on stage, would that do it? What about SAing a Palestinian?
I ask because realistically speaking doing these would lose the Dems the election, and yet the genocide is exactly this except in the thousands. You'd never expect people to vote for either of these people if they publicly did something heinous, and yet the genocide is exactly something heinous, just not as in your face as the president doing it on stage.
Of course there is. If Harris shot a child and Trump said he'd shoot 10 children, who would you rather deal with? Or is that a hard choice you'd rather not make by avoiding voting?
It's like women's rights in relation to abortion. The vast majority of leftist men who seemingly don't care if a Trump admin results in a federal ban, and would rather spend their energy convincing themselves that they can dissuade Dems from supporting Israel.
Fix what you can but don't delude yourself into thinking you can fix what you can't, and then berate others for not partaking in your Sisyphean tasks.
If this, if that...
Liberals don't live in the real world
Of course they don't, if they did, they'd actually learn lessons.
Are you being deceptive on purpose or did you just misunderstand my question?
I didn't ask if Harris shot a child and Trump promised to shoot 10/more who would you rather deal with, I asked if Kamala simply shot a child, would that be enough for you not to vote for her? Literally, right now, you switch on the news and see every channel telling you Kamala just shot a Palestinian child in the face and you see the video of it, meanwhile Trump is making zero claims about shooting any children; do you still vote for her? To reiterate my question: Is there anything Kamala or Biden could do you would consider a valid reason not to vote for either of them?
The point of the question is that you and I both know she'd lose either every Dem voter or the vast majority of them, meanwhile an actual genocide is taking place where many, many more are dying and the same people who'd stop voting for her because of her shooting a child wouldn't care about the tens of thousands who've died sight unseen.
Let me put a second question up as well: Why should Biden or Kamala bother going to any more debates? Who cares? Literally as a voter you have a choice between either Kamala or Trump, and you're supposed to vote for Kamala, so why should she bother going to the debates? What are the Dem voters going to do about it, not vote for her and get Trump instead?
I'll even give you the answer to the second question: It's because Kamala's supposed to be trying to win; it's literally the same reason they're supposed to stop supporting the genocide. If they're not putting in the effort to win, how is that the fault of the people who won't vote for them? This goes back to the first question: shooting a child in the face would lose them the election (although the purpose of the first question is to point out people are more bothered with the evil they can see than the monumental evil they can't/won't).
And what task is that? Literally what task do you think people are berating you for? Everyone who is no longer voting for the Dems right now just want Kamala/Biden to stop supporting genocide, it's neither Sisyphean and nor is it directed at the people who are voting for Kamala, and as you were the one to bring it up, tell me: do you think Biden/Kamala ceasing support for genocide is Sisyphean? Simply not sending weapons at the very bare minimum?
And please don't try to be deceptive again; you can clearly see what I've posted here so don't pretend I asked a question I didn't.
deleted by creator
This is what I tell the libs I know: by far the biggest danger in this election is the "good guys" finding out there are zero consequences for doing an active genocide right out in the open.
The protestors want to pressure Harris/the dems so that they stop providing unlimited aid to Israel's ongoing genocide. Do you think that cutting aid to Israel would cost the dems more electorally than wholeheartedly enabling the genocide would?
Do you not perceive the entire Democrat establishment giving full throated support of a genocide while endorsing college kids getting the shit kicked out of them and moving to the right of Trump on immigration as the death knell of the party? Yeah the DNC might exist as an entity for the next 100 years but you're delusional if you think that there is anything there other than "But Trump is worse" to offer people. Harris has been abandoning any policies that even hint at being progressive at a break neck pace and has made it painfully clear to anyone actually paying attention that there is zero daylight between her and Biden. They can't even pretend to care about immigrants anymore and are falling back to "Well yes we haven't actually done anything to defend women or LGBTQ rights but at least we're not actively trying to murder them."
deleted by creator