If someone concludes that it's fine for them to eat cows because cows never invented computers, then there's not really much of an argument against aliens turning us into meat slurry because they have the 4-chambered quantum brains needed to invent hyperdrive and we don't, is there?

  • BeamBrain [he/him]
    hexagon
    M
    ·
    5 months ago

    Thanks for reminding me that I still have your trilogy sitting in my Amazon library unread angery (in my defense, it's largely because graeber had to come first)

    "a perfect copy of someone is literally the same person, not just a new person that is pre-loaded with someone else's memories"

    I'm inclined to say no, but I'll admit that's almost entirely because of Roko's Basilisk

    • UlyssesT
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      deleted by creator

      • BeamBrain [he/him]
        hexagon
        M
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        It's especially funny to me because it betrays a lack of understanding of how computers (and physics) even work. Thinking you can build a perfect copy of a person from previous records of their existence is like thinking you can with absolute certainty 100% accurately reconstruct a 1000x1000 image from a 100x100 resized copy of it. Sure, you can make an educated guess what was in those missing 990,000 pixels, even make a pretty good extrapolation, but since there are a lot more ways to combine pixels into a 1000x1000 grid than there are to combine them in a 100x100 grid, then by definition the smaller image must map to multiple possible larger ones - and a .png is a hell of a lot less complex than a human being. Entropy says no.

        • UlyssesT
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          deleted by creator

    • UlyssesT
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      deleted by creator