Frank [he/him, he/him] to chapotraphouse • 29 days agoBlueFash are already working on the narrative for putting their loss on Muslims if they lose.imagemessage-square54 fedilinkarrow-up1213
arrow-up1213imageBlueFash are already working on the narrative for putting their loss on Muslims if they lose.Frank [he/him, he/him] to chapotraphouse • 29 days agomessage-square54 Commentsfedilink
minus-squarevovchik_ilich [he/him]hexbear48·29 days agoYou're not missing anything, the whole argument is "they're Arabs, so if they're not voting Kamala it must mean they're radical anti-LGBT islamists" link
minus-squarePolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.mlhexbear11·edit-229 days agoI wonder what would president Harris do if Lawrence v. Texas gets invalidated during her term like Roe v. Wade was during Biden's linkfedilink
minus-squarevovchik_ilich [he/him]hexbear11·edit-229 days agoFellow comrade, I'm not aware of what Lawrence v. Texas is. Can you enlighten me or point me towards a good source? link
minus-squarePolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.mlhexbear10·edit-229 days agoIt's the court precedence by which SCOTUS invalidated sodomy laws on federal level, therefore legalising homosexuality in entire country. In 2003 no less, so US despite all of the posturing was still deeply in the tail behind most western countries. linkfedilink
You're not missing anything, the whole argument is "they're Arabs, so if they're not voting Kamala it must mean they're radical anti-LGBT islamists"
I wonder what would president Harris do if Lawrence v. Texas gets invalidated during her term like Roe v. Wade was during Biden's
Fellow comrade, I'm not aware of what Lawrence v. Texas is. Can you enlighten me or point me towards a good source?
It's the court precedence by which SCOTUS invalidated sodomy laws on federal level, therefore legalising homosexuality in entire country. In 2003 no less, so US despite all of the posturing was still deeply in the tail behind most western countries.