...almost

  • Awoo [she/her]
    ·
    21 days ago

    My take is that both feed into one another. The larger a mass movement gets the more propaganda of the deed happens and you literally can't stop it, people WILL do it and you must incorporate it into your plans one way or another because you can't stop it.

    The more frequent it becomes, the closer you are to the real revolutionary moment.

    • -6-6-6-@lemmygrad.ml
      ·
      edit-2
      21 days ago

      Yes and no. I don't think they "feed" each other more as they are a result of the same conditions.

      That would be nice, but 15 years from now if another Kaczynski type rises up I don't think P.S.L taking credit or supporting the action will help them in anyway unless they already have achieved "mass-movement". We only have a few big parties that could achieve something like this. Understanding why this is is far more important than preparing to go Punisher, at least in my opinion.

      But you are right, I can't stop anyone from doing anything. I agree with that.

      If anything, them existing as they do now is a mutually beneficial agreement. I also said before that in my opinion, there are more effective ways of "direct action." Sabotage is what comes to mind immediately. I said earlier that destroying a clean-room does a lot more damage than icing a CEO. Perhaps sabotage and other actions like this can be under a separate militant wing. There's precedence for that.