Hello users of Hexbear, there have been many changes and some drama the past few months.
The recent changes we've been making have been an attempt to create a more safe and welcoming environment for many demographics that have been overlooked in the past.
For any of our comrades that have been unintentionally hurt in this process, we apologise and hope to find a solution that accommodates as many people as possible while still meeting the needs of the marginalised groups who need a space like this the most.
The intent of this post is to provide a space for all users to air grievances with regard to the site. As well as provide suggestions for specific things that could be changed to address your grievance. Comments insulting the mod team or those without a specific means to address your problem may be removed. No commenter will be sitebanned, unless it clearly breaks the code of conduct.
does anybody else feel like they maybe just fundamentally do not understand the Code of Conduct, or is it just me?
I know the subject of updating it has come up in this thread. this is not about updates; this is about my comprehension of the current content.
highlights I feel like I must be misreading:
being unkind, making things personal, insulting and demeaning each other – these behaviors are common here.
emphasis mine. this might be true for DM harassment, but is blatantly untrue in public. account age definitely affects moderation decisions, and it probably should?
... flaming? will be banned?
emphasis mine. I wish it were more clear if this goes for the admin/mod team or the community at large, but regardless, in practice, this doesn't seem to be true, but maybe there are judgements being made about sincerity/good-faith that are not expressed explicitly enough for me to pick up on it.
this is all advice I have taken before when I have gotten too down about the social dynamics here, and I will again, but it seems like some people do feel compelled to stay here, to their own detriment. idk what to do about that, or if anything should be done at all; it is just a thing that I have noticed.
this does not seem to be true, and again, idk that it should be. if an otherwise good user is focused on complaining about actual problems, should they really be banned? if so, why didn't frauddogg get banned?
I'm not saying null should have been banned. I am using a recent example to clarify the question. I understood that many others agreed with frauddogg's behavior, and that has made me want to understand it and square it with everything else I've learned about the community so I could contribute positively and avoid hurting anyone.
again, I'm not suggesting changes; I am expressing confusion about these statements that don't seem to align with the realities of this community. I feel like I don't get it or I am missing something or just misreading these things.
We will commit to involving the community in a code of conduct review and update, thank you for bringing this up and the highlights.