wtypstanaccount04 [he/him]M to traingang • 4 years agoTrain good car badimagemessage-square33 fedilinkarrow-up188file-text
arrow-up188imageTrain good car badwtypstanaccount04 [he/him]M to traingang • 4 years agomessage-square33 Commentsfedilinkfile-text
minus-squaregarbology [he/him]hexbear3·4 years agoWhat's the value in elevating the track like that? link
minus-squareFuckedByRailcars [any]hexbear11·4 years agoLess level crossings and less trespassing link
minus-squaregarbology [he/him]hexbear2·4 years agoBut tunnelling allows you to use (or keep using) the land surface for something else, while the elevated track in practice, still monopolises the landuse. So why not put the track on the surface if it's not underground? link
minus-squarezifnab25 [he/him, any]hexbear3·4 years agoLooks like there's some kind of walking/biking path under the raised rail. Additional green space, too. link
What's the value in elevating the track like that?
Less level crossings and less trespassing
deleted by creator
But tunnelling allows you to use (or keep using) the land surface for something else, while the elevated track in practice, still monopolises the landuse. So why not put the track on the surface if it's not underground?
deleted by creator
Looks like there's some kind of walking/biking path under the raised rail. Additional green space, too.