• wahming@monyet.cc
    ·
    1 year ago

    What's the point of looking at the stars of we never reach for them? At some point the telescopes have to move into space, we can't stay earthbound forever

    • Chetzemoka@startrek.website
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Or we could regulate the reflectivity of satellites. No one is suggesting we shouldn't have satellites. Why don't we do satellites on purpose in a way that still allows us to also do effective astronomy?

      • beautiful_boater [he/him, any]
        ·
        1 year ago

        They can't make them non-reflective enough to not interrupt really deep observing. Also, that just shifts the problem around. If they are absorbing in the visible, they will likely have huge amounts of blackbody radiation in IR, sub/millimeter, and radio. You would need to make a satellite out of dark matter to not interrupt astronomy.

        • UlyssesT
          ·
          edit-2
          16 days ago

          deleted by creator

      • wahming@monyet.cc
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        No one is suggesting we shouldn't have satellites.

        Many astronomers suggested exactly that, they were against the approval of starlink.

        we could regulate the reflectivity of satellites

        Starlink has been doing that for 3 years now. There are limits to how nonreflective they can get the satellites.

        • Chetzemoka@startrek.website
          ·
          1 year ago

          Standard issue Musk brain rot.

          "Shouldn't have satellites" at all vs. "maybe let's not approve this one corporation doing this completely unregulated activity." If you really can't tell the difference between those two things, I can't help you.

          "limited to how nonreflective they can get the satellites"

          Citation needed.

          • UlyssesT
            ·
            edit-2
            16 days ago

            deleted by creator

    • UlyssesT
      ·
      edit-2
      16 days ago

      deleted by creator

      • wahming@monyet.cc
        ·
        1 year ago

        The satellite constellations are in LEO. Kessler syndrome is literally not possible at that altitude.

        • UlyssesT
          ·
          edit-2
          16 days ago

          deleted by creator

          • sharedburdens [she/her, comrade/them]
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            but have you considered that this under-regulated shlock allows for command and control in warzones across the world shitty internet service in "remote areas"

    • beautiful_boater [he/him, any]
      ·
      1 year ago

      Man, I just went to a good seminar today on finding habitable exoplanets that emphasized that we currently need ground based telescopes, because it is still impractical to make 30+ meter telescopes in space and would be very expensive, even if could be done. But progress is just launching a bunch of bullshit into orbit to avoid real investment in infrastructure like fiber and other telecommunication lines.

      • UlyssesT
        ·
        edit-2
        16 days ago

        deleted by creator

      • UlyssesT
        ·
        edit-2
        16 days ago

        deleted by creator