That's what I'm moving toward too. A confederation of homesteads localising the food supply in an ecologically sustainable way, collective mutual aid projects like the Black Panther breakfasts. I just need to find the right area that's cheap enough to afford a few acres, not heavily reactionary, and water-safe enough to survive the next decade.
Northern Michigan and the great lakes in general are my primary candidate, but Michigan's right-wing militias are extreme enough to try to kidnap the governor (with the FBI's help, but I doubt it took much convincing) and the way they handle environmental disasters is uniquely atrocious. Wisconsin is similarly reactionary but it's next to Chicago's socialist base while Minnesota at least has the left-wing movements in Minneapolis that will disperse into the surrounding area along with lots of freshwater sources and a border with Canada. I'd love to do the PNW, especially Washington, but that's Northwest Imperative country and the Nazis are already firmly established in that exact kind of setup.
The pending southwestern, coastal southern, and coastal northeastern migration waves are all big spooks. Getting ahead of that curve, even in the smallest way with residency and some kind of minor land ownership before the value bubbles, seems like the best decision I can make.
With the kidnapping, even if they were handed the plan they were radicalised enough to commit to it. The thing that really concerns me is how readily the militias downplayed the reality of the event while simultaneously endorsing everything about it and fetishising it. It was very similar to Kyle Rittenhouse. Regardless of the circumstances, although they're much more indicting in his case, it was turned into an act of martyrdom for a group of people who worship hero narratives. Everyone accepted the standard he set as readily as incels accepted Elliott Rodgers or Nazis did Dylan Roof. If their local extremists are willing to commit to something so comically extreme, when local conditions deteriorate they're already prepared to endorse. If given the opportunity as they were in Oregon with the wildfires, it takes groups like that all of half an hour to coalesce into a death squad.
I would look to Canada and Alaska, or even some areas of Montana. Pretty much everywhere is going to get hotter and change, just try not to displace indigenous peoples.
Alaska would be lovely if not for the cost of importing materials. As a fungiculturist I can't do much with softwood so I'd be importing hardwood internationally from BC or from the mainland. Same goes for any complex manufacturing. Montana's outdoor growing season is shittier than Colorado's which already infuriates me. The Rockies give you very little summer to work with and it's full of giant hail. The lower population density would be great compared to areas next to major metropolitan areas in the midwest, but homesteading would be frustrating.
Youre goiing to have to learn from Native American strategies in areas like montana. Theres a reason why cattle rearing is still done there, you have to survive off things like grass which you can only readily do if you use ruminants as an intermediate. They can provide oils through butter and suet, wool if you use goats or alpacas, or leather otherwise. Learn from the people that came before us, we are their inheritors whether we like it or not.
deleted by creator
That's what I'm moving toward too. A confederation of homesteads localising the food supply in an ecologically sustainable way, collective mutual aid projects like the Black Panther breakfasts. I just need to find the right area that's cheap enough to afford a few acres, not heavily reactionary, and water-safe enough to survive the next decade.
deleted by creator
Northern Michigan and the great lakes in general are my primary candidate, but Michigan's right-wing militias are extreme enough to try to kidnap the governor (with the FBI's help, but I doubt it took much convincing) and the way they handle environmental disasters is uniquely atrocious. Wisconsin is similarly reactionary but it's next to Chicago's socialist base while Minnesota at least has the left-wing movements in Minneapolis that will disperse into the surrounding area along with lots of freshwater sources and a border with Canada. I'd love to do the PNW, especially Washington, but that's Northwest Imperative country and the Nazis are already firmly established in that exact kind of setup.
deleted by creator
The pending southwestern, coastal southern, and coastal northeastern migration waves are all big spooks. Getting ahead of that curve, even in the smallest way with residency and some kind of minor land ownership before the value bubbles, seems like the best decision I can make.
With the kidnapping, even if they were handed the plan they were radicalised enough to commit to it. The thing that really concerns me is how readily the militias downplayed the reality of the event while simultaneously endorsing everything about it and fetishising it. It was very similar to Kyle Rittenhouse. Regardless of the circumstances, although they're much more indicting in his case, it was turned into an act of martyrdom for a group of people who worship hero narratives. Everyone accepted the standard he set as readily as incels accepted Elliott Rodgers or Nazis did Dylan Roof. If their local extremists are willing to commit to something so comically extreme, when local conditions deteriorate they're already prepared to endorse. If given the opportunity as they were in Oregon with the wildfires, it takes groups like that all of half an hour to coalesce into a death squad.
deleted by creator
I would look to Canada and Alaska, or even some areas of Montana. Pretty much everywhere is going to get hotter and change, just try not to displace indigenous peoples.
Alaska would be lovely if not for the cost of importing materials. As a fungiculturist I can't do much with softwood so I'd be importing hardwood internationally from BC or from the mainland. Same goes for any complex manufacturing. Montana's outdoor growing season is shittier than Colorado's which already infuriates me. The Rockies give you very little summer to work with and it's full of giant hail. The lower population density would be great compared to areas next to major metropolitan areas in the midwest, but homesteading would be frustrating.
Youre goiing to have to learn from Native American strategies in areas like montana. Theres a reason why cattle rearing is still done there, you have to survive off things like grass which you can only readily do if you use ruminants as an intermediate. They can provide oils through butter and suet, wool if you use goats or alpacas, or leather otherwise. Learn from the people that came before us, we are their inheritors whether we like it or not.