Funny aside, ziq hates me :D

  • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    hexagon
    M
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    , but its certainly not directly antagonistic either.

    I don't know who you're talking to, or in what context, but I can assure you there's plenty of antagonism: Here's a classic: https://athens.indymedia.org/post/1349901/

    • sharedburdens [she/her, comrade/them]
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      That's what I meant with fucking around with parliament- I don't disagree that they're too committed to the existing state. I have a lot of issues with the organization but it's a product of more than just being ML - there's a lot of historical reasons at play too and I can appreciate why they reluctant to challenge the state directly.

      This is the same reason organizations I work in don't cooperate with electorally-oriented groups either.

      Dogmatism is a problem in every tendency. Same reason I push back on anarchists (or MLs) trying to start fights over political disagreements from like a hundred years ago. The problem is the capitalists with the boot on all our necks.

      • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        hexagon
        M
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Mate, it's not just the party. Half my family are tankies. I have immense and exhaustive experience with ML hypocrisy and their true thoughts about Anarchists. I also have a lot of lived experiences on this. A lot of my best friends as a young adult were in the KNE. I've written for KNE papers. It's part of the reason why it's worthless to ask me to debate my positions. It's when people can't understand that and want to act all sealiony and/or condescending that I turn to ridiculing them.

        Y'all can believe what you want about "left-unity". I have had both enough experience and theory to hold my positions on it.

        . The problem is the capitalists with the boot on all our necks.

        We all know anarchists and MLs agree in theory, but when it comes to praxis, cooperation only works when it's anarchist praxis.

        • sharedburdens [she/her, comrade/them]
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Not trying to sealion - l'm not even trying to debate you at this point.

          Most of my family that were 'tankies' have passed and most of the younger ones are completely disengaged politically.

          spoiler

          Also as a trans person they were way cooler about it than the more 'traditional' ones, one of whom was misgendering me on her deathbed.

          I will also say that my lived experience doing years of encampment support in the US, I run into way more MLs (formally or informally) who I have been able to consistently work with towards shared goals. That's why I feel obligated to point out that most of the distinction made online (in particular about hypothetical revolutions) fade away in the real world.

          • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            hexagon
            M
            ·
            1 year ago

            Not trying to sealion - l’m not even trying to debate you at this point.

            I didn't accuse you of it. I was speaking rhetorically to explain why I'm been ridiculing hexbears the past few days.

            Most of my family that were ‘tankies’ have passed and most of the younger ones are completely disengaged politically.

            I don't know if you are talking about family in Greece itself or not but it seems your lived experiences are US-centric. Almost my tankie relatives are very much alive, and the younger gen is pretty into the same theory as well. There's obviously changes in some social standards, but the core is remains surprisingly similar to what I'm used to.

            I will also say that my lived experience doing years of encampment support in the US, I run into way more MLs (formally or informally) who I have been able to consistently work with towards shared goals

            Well thing is, anarchists in 1917 were probably of the same opinion until things like the Konstadt started happening. We can literally read contemporary anarchists get completely disillusioned with their revolution once the MLs took power. And that's before the bad times even.

            • sharedburdens [she/her, comrade/them]
              ·
              1 year ago

              I don't know if you are talking about family in Greece itself or not but it seems your lived experiences are US-centric.

              Specifically Greek, I have almost no family in the US.

              anarchists in 1917 were probably of the same opinion until things like the Konstadt started happening.

              I'm a pretty paranoid person, but one of the things I have resigned myself to is that you can't really change the world without exposing yourself to deception (and doing some deception yourself). Historical events are the product of their historical context, I prefer to work with comrades I can find here and now, and let them be the ones to disappoint me.

              • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                hexagon
                M
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                This is the sad part y'all not getting about the arguments from the anarchists like me. It's not that the MLs are "nyah nyah" deceptive currently. They probably truly believe what they say. But the ML praxis will invariably lead to the same outcomes of hierarchical oppression to any dissent and especially anarchist dissent, "for the good of the revolution". Bakunin predicted this years before Lenin! I'm not going to wait to be surprised pikachu about it.

                • sharedburdens [she/her, comrade/them]
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  I'm not going to wait to be surprised pikachu about it.

                  Thing is you cited the example of a existing ML org not being radical enough and refusing to really challenge power in there here and now as evidence that in the future (if successful) they're gonna be exterminating dissent. That's why you're not really reaching me.