It's more that the parts you're uncomfortable with are kind of reliable techniques that will achieve certain insights or mindstates if you keep it connected to the theological base. The issue is when those techniques are mistaken for the actual substance of the religion by the practitioner (much like someone in the Golden Dawn who interprets "Do what thou will shall be the whole of the law" as "do whatever you want".)
That's not what Buddha says though (Or Catholicism.) Friends are great, Buddha and his followers had friends. Buddha says "Noble friends and companions are the whole of the holy life." Jesus exhorts people to peace, communion, and love at an individual as well as a collective level.
No, attachment isn't liking a thing, removing attachment is recognising the ultimate impermanence of the thing as an indivisible part of a changing, shifting, interconnected reality and accepting joyfully that inevitable change.
Yeah, Western Buddhists get a taste of that, especially when applied to the Self, and it turns them utterly insufferable (it also turns a lot of Tradcaths insufferable too if they get the Catholic version, but they're already awful so it's hard to notice)
It's more they gain this marginally mystical insight into the nature of how we perceive reality, and it's not nothing, it does have some benefits in terms of focus and overall wellbeing, and then treat it as if they've been given secret divine knowledge that is utterly obvious but that us ordinary humans Just. Can't. Understand unless they do exactly the same things (even though mystical disciplines are almost functionally the same up to the point you get to the realisation of The Witness.)
Buddha himself basically says "just try my shit out, see if it works." So you've got a good start there. Also most Schools recommend a modest approach to non monastic buddhists, focusing on "Stream Entry".
Catholics focus more on "Union with the Divine" rather than "Annhilation of the Self" so it tends to manifest more as an experience of the grace and presence of God and his plan in all things rather than a holistic experience of the oneness of the universe. Functionally it's pretty close to the same thing.
deleted by creator
It's more that the parts you're uncomfortable with are kind of reliable techniques that will achieve certain insights or mindstates if you keep it connected to the theological base. The issue is when those techniques are mistaken for the actual substance of the religion by the practitioner (much like someone in the Golden Dawn who interprets "Do what thou will shall be the whole of the law" as "do whatever you want".)
deleted by creator
That's not what Buddha says though (Or Catholicism.) Friends are great, Buddha and his followers had friends. Buddha says "Noble friends and companions are the whole of the holy life." Jesus exhorts people to peace, communion, and love at an individual as well as a collective level.
deleted by creator
No, attachment isn't liking a thing, removing attachment is recognising the ultimate impermanence of the thing as an indivisible part of a changing, shifting, interconnected reality and accepting joyfully that inevitable change.
deleted by creator
Yeah, Western Buddhists get a taste of that, especially when applied to the Self, and it turns them utterly insufferable (it also turns a lot of Tradcaths insufferable too if they get the Catholic version, but they're already awful so it's hard to notice)
deleted by creator
It's more they gain this marginally mystical insight into the nature of how we perceive reality, and it's not nothing, it does have some benefits in terms of focus and overall wellbeing, and then treat it as if they've been given secret divine knowledge that is utterly obvious but that us ordinary humans Just. Can't. Understand unless they do exactly the same things (even though mystical disciplines are almost functionally the same up to the point you get to the realisation of The Witness.)
deleted by creator
Buddha himself basically says "just try my shit out, see if it works." So you've got a good start there. Also most Schools recommend a modest approach to non monastic buddhists, focusing on "Stream Entry".
Catholics focus more on "Union with the Divine" rather than "Annhilation of the Self" so it tends to manifest more as an experience of the grace and presence of God and his plan in all things rather than a holistic experience of the oneness of the universe. Functionally it's pretty close to the same thing.
deleted by creator
you're really good at oversimplifying things you don't understand :) good skill :)
deleted by creator