For those curious, you can find the essay that HLR refused to publish here:
https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/harvard-law-review-gaza-israel-genocide/
In North Korea, academics are prevented from publishing their work if their conclusions are politically unpopular. Some people even threaten to kill scholars and journal publishers if they publish papers which embarrass the ruling party.
The Nation version is click bait garbage. The original was denied both for safety concerns and it simply wasn't good enough.
And ?
Btw the conclusion of your link lmao, and you should read it entirely btw again. If you can write, i mean why not after all.
“It’s important to remember that there is no hierarchy among crimes under international law,” Amnesty International said in a statement. “As stated in the preamble of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court; genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes all are ‘the most serious crimes of concern to the international community as a whole [and] must not go unpunished.’”
Verdeja put it even more simply. “The international community has responsibility already,” he said. “Whether it’s genocide or not I think is a little bit beside the point.”
Still stupid to repeat a word over and over without knowing what it means. Words are important.
If you agree with the article, use war crimes instead. That makes sense. Don't feed the stupid people.
If u read the article you would see there is no proper way to do,
There is some for whom this is a genocide with their arguments, and counters views with their poor arguments, both presented in your article.
You choose, I've too.
End of story. Go read it and understand it, and then calm yourself.
I have no idea what you are saying. I have little doubt you had no idea what you read. End of story.
Ad hominen vs logical arguments.
Yep end of story like I said. Ty percochet.
It's perfectly reasonable to assume you do not understand what you are reading, but please do excuse yourself.
