Bakhmut was probably the only battle of this entire war where the casualties were about equal on both sides. Partly due to the urban nature of the fighting but also partly i suspect due to how Prigozhin used Wagner as an extension of his own ego. In every other engagement on every other front the disparity in casualties has been heavily skewed in Russia's favor, especially when they are on the defensive. Though Russia having such a disproportionate artillery superiority and being able to employ actual air power leads to higher Ukrainian casualties even when the Russians are technically attacking, like is the case in the new cauldron that has formed around Avdeyevka.
I doubt the losses were equal, Wagner estimate of their own losses seems pretty sus in light of both Ukraine and USA just accepting that figure after previously claiming around fuckzillion. Maybe they used that opportunity to scratch some paper-only soldiers, i never heard about mercenary outfit that didn't had those.
But regardless, they also claim 50000 UA KIA, which is most likely also overestimated but the proportion of 2:5 seems to be much more consistent with various estimates during the battle.
At this point we're entering into speculative territory but i would not be surprised if you were right once we count the losses that the Ukrainians took on the flanks, as well as those taken in trying to supply the Bakhmut garrison. I believe that is where the more disproportionate losses were inflicted by Russia: in forcing Ukraine to try and assault the pincers to relieve the semi-encirclement, and in trying to get reinforcements and supplies into the city through roads under Russian fire control. For the block to block fighting inside the city itself i still think it makes more sense for the casualties to be close to equal, but i don't think we'll know for sure any time soon. I also suspect you are right that Wagner tend to inflate both sides' figures.
Bakhmut was probably the only battle of this entire war where the casualties were about equal on both sides. Partly due to the urban nature of the fighting but also partly i suspect due to how Prigozhin used Wagner as an extension of his own ego. In every other engagement on every other front the disparity in casualties has been heavily skewed in Russia's favor, especially when they are on the defensive. Though Russia having such a disproportionate artillery superiority and being able to employ actual air power leads to higher Ukrainian casualties even when the Russians are technically attacking, like is the case in the new cauldron that has formed around Avdeyevka.
I doubt the losses were equal, Wagner estimate of their own losses seems pretty sus in light of both Ukraine and USA just accepting that figure after previously claiming around fuckzillion. Maybe they used that opportunity to scratch some paper-only soldiers, i never heard about mercenary outfit that didn't had those.
But regardless, they also claim 50000 UA KIA, which is most likely also overestimated but the proportion of 2:5 seems to be much more consistent with various estimates during the battle.
At this point we're entering into speculative territory but i would not be surprised if you were right once we count the losses that the Ukrainians took on the flanks, as well as those taken in trying to supply the Bakhmut garrison. I believe that is where the more disproportionate losses were inflicted by Russia: in forcing Ukraine to try and assault the pincers to relieve the semi-encirclement, and in trying to get reinforcements and supplies into the city through roads under Russian fire control. For the block to block fighting inside the city itself i still think it makes more sense for the casualties to be close to equal, but i don't think we'll know for sure any time soon. I also suspect you are right that Wagner tend to inflate both sides' figures.