The government of Afghanistan wasn't anti-Islamist though, they passed Islamist laws and policies and I would argue they went too far in appeasement of those religious elements, rather than being truly secular. Give fundamentalists an inch, and they'll take a whole ass country.
And while it's claimed that the socialist Afghanistan government was unpopular, I don't see any evidence of this aside from neoliberal sources, and that has been said about every socialist government, and the government was at least popular enough to where it remained in power for many years until the USSR was pushed out by the Mujahadeen and increasing costs of the war itself. There's a marxist youtuber who is an arabic woman who grew up in Soviet-aligned Afghanistan and sings it's many praises.
I understand that the Taliban formed after the Mujahadeen, and were made of people from various backgrounds and various claimed ideologies and motivations, but after all my research, I still maintain that the Mujahadeen were nothing more than religious fundamentalists fighting against socialism, and that putting them down was necessary. My main concerns would have been the Soviets limiting civilian casualties and taking a stance more like China's approach to Xinjiang.
Yeah, it's unfortunate that China funded separatist and fundamentalist groups against the USSR. The Sino-Soviet split was a fucking travesty.
I admit, I don't know everything, and I've never set foot in Afghanistan, and I a Latino POC living in the U.S., and I'll gladly admit when I'm wrong or ignorant of something, and I'm not saying that the Soviets were flawless angels, but to me it seems you are slightly whitewashing the Mujahadeen and downplaying the achievements of the Afghanistan SSR.
Some issues with your post comrade... first it wasn't an official SSR, it was styled as the 'Democratic Republic of Afghanistan'. They outlawed Sharia law, gave rights to women, and instituted moderate Islamic secular policies that the majority conservative elements of the country did not agree with. Yes, the land reform was very popular with groups of the country, but very unpopular with others.
Regarding the popularity/sources, the leaders of the USSR itself themselves knew that the govt was not widely popular on the same level as USSR/Cuba/China and that it wasn't worth it getting involved, as they repeatedly voted against intervention several times before the decision to was made. After Brezhnev died, many of the Politburo were pissed at him for getting them into the conflict, as they felt deceived.
Also, whitewashing the Mujahideen? You seem to be conflating my description of their viewpoints to support of them, which I don't. Like I said, they were brutal, and extremely well armed and funded. Another poster said (that I agree with), that the govt ran too far ahead of the masses (to paraphrase a Stalin quote). I may be mistaken as well, this is just what I know from reading and a couple of Afghani acquaintances.
I understand you don't mean that you support the Mujahadeen's goals or methods, and I apologize if it sounded like an accusation, I just meant it sounded kind of in the same realm.
I don't know many people from SW Asia, or enough to have deep conversations with, and I will defer to you and those you spoke with, since you seem to be very informed and have a head on your shoulders, but do you have an explanation for this, then? I struggle with that supposedly Stalin wanted to almost outlaw Sharia law or women wearing full Niqab/Hijabs, but he was convinced not to. That doesn't mean thatnthe state wasn't too hard or soft on Islam, it's still definitely possible, and I understand my anecdote is removed from my perspective and could be wrong, but I struggle to "jell" that.
No worries comrade. Religion is always a tricky issue for Communists... while we are materialists and do not usually agree with the idealism of religion (of which I count myself), religion is a deep rooted part of people's culture that many people hold dear due to familial reasons or otherwise, especially in times of duress and poverty. It's usually best to live and let live. For example, in 1941 when the Great Patriotic War happened, people flocked to churches in fear, and Stalin knew to just let people do that, lest it build resentment at the difficult time. But then after the war, anti-religious sentiment was stepped up, and built so much resentment that we have the very hyper-religious Russia of today. Although I don't care much for the social democracies of Europe for many reasons, I think having a strong education system (to put it broadly) like theirs is the best tool as people will slowly turn away from religion over the generations once the fear of "this world" is less pronounced and their material needs are met and they are less inclined to find hope in the "next world".
The government of Afghanistan wasn't anti-Islamist though, they passed Islamist laws and policies and I would argue they went too far in appeasement of those religious elements, rather than being truly secular. Give fundamentalists an inch, and they'll take a whole ass country.
And while it's claimed that the socialist Afghanistan government was unpopular, I don't see any evidence of this aside from neoliberal sources, and that has been said about every socialist government, and the government was at least popular enough to where it remained in power for many years until the USSR was pushed out by the Mujahadeen and increasing costs of the war itself. There's a marxist youtuber who is an arabic woman who grew up in Soviet-aligned Afghanistan and sings it's many praises.
I understand that the Taliban formed after the Mujahadeen, and were made of people from various backgrounds and various claimed ideologies and motivations, but after all my research, I still maintain that the Mujahadeen were nothing more than religious fundamentalists fighting against socialism, and that putting them down was necessary. My main concerns would have been the Soviets limiting civilian casualties and taking a stance more like China's approach to Xinjiang.
Yeah, it's unfortunate that China funded separatist and fundamentalist groups against the USSR. The Sino-Soviet split was a fucking travesty.
I admit, I don't know everything, and I've never set foot in Afghanistan, and I a Latino POC living in the U.S., and I'll gladly admit when I'm wrong or ignorant of something, and I'm not saying that the Soviets were flawless angels, but to me it seems you are slightly whitewashing the Mujahadeen and downplaying the achievements of the Afghanistan SSR.
Some issues with your post comrade... first it wasn't an official SSR, it was styled as the 'Democratic Republic of Afghanistan'. They outlawed Sharia law, gave rights to women, and instituted moderate Islamic secular policies that the majority conservative elements of the country did not agree with. Yes, the land reform was very popular with groups of the country, but very unpopular with others.
Regarding the popularity/sources, the leaders of the USSR itself themselves knew that the govt was not widely popular on the same level as USSR/Cuba/China and that it wasn't worth it getting involved, as they repeatedly voted against intervention several times before the decision to was made. After Brezhnev died, many of the Politburo were pissed at him for getting them into the conflict, as they felt deceived.
Also, whitewashing the Mujahideen? You seem to be conflating my description of their viewpoints to support of them, which I don't. Like I said, they were brutal, and extremely well armed and funded. Another poster said (that I agree with), that the govt ran too far ahead of the masses (to paraphrase a Stalin quote). I may be mistaken as well, this is just what I know from reading and a couple of Afghani acquaintances.
I understand you don't mean that you support the Mujahadeen's goals or methods, and I apologize if it sounded like an accusation, I just meant it sounded kind of in the same realm.
I don't know many people from SW Asia, or enough to have deep conversations with, and I will defer to you and those you spoke with, since you seem to be very informed and have a head on your shoulders, but do you have an explanation for this, then? I struggle with that supposedly Stalin wanted to almost outlaw Sharia law or women wearing full Niqab/Hijabs, but he was convinced not to. That doesn't mean thatnthe state wasn't too hard or soft on Islam, it's still definitely possible, and I understand my anecdote is removed from my perspective and could be wrong, but I struggle to "jell" that.
No worries comrade. Religion is always a tricky issue for Communists... while we are materialists and do not usually agree with the idealism of religion (of which I count myself), religion is a deep rooted part of people's culture that many people hold dear due to familial reasons or otherwise, especially in times of duress and poverty. It's usually best to live and let live. For example, in 1941 when the Great Patriotic War happened, people flocked to churches in fear, and Stalin knew to just let people do that, lest it build resentment at the difficult time. But then after the war, anti-religious sentiment was stepped up, and built so much resentment that we have the very hyper-religious Russia of today. Although I don't care much for the social democracies of Europe for many reasons, I think having a strong education system (to put it broadly) like theirs is the best tool as people will slowly turn away from religion over the generations once the fear of "this world" is less pronounced and their material needs are met and they are less inclined to find hope in the "next world".