Now that a fall federal election is all but confirmed, could someone enlighten me? These guys hate each other, apparently. Best I can see is that the MLs seem more committed to policy and electoral change, and the CPC seems more interested in agitating via campus groups etc. I feel like Elizabeth Rowley is a bit of a goober but that's based on nothing, and I have no sense of Anna Di Carlo at all. I swear I used to have a better idea of their differences, but now all I can say for sure is that the CPC has a kick-ass logo and the CPC(ML) needs to hire a web developer.

Any thoughts? Edit: Tbh given that both parties tend to attract less than 10,000 votes federally, I don't know if they should be considered (or consider themselves) as anything more than activist orgs that attract a protest vote, but would be interesting to get some broader insight.

  • EmmaGoldman [she/her, comrade/them]M
    ·
    3 years ago

    Honestly, they're both just activist orgs these days and my understanding is the rivalry is pretty much on the Judean People's Front vs, People's Front of Judea level. They're pretty minor and mostly just agitate for unions and on campus or yell at clouds Ottawa.