• carl_marks_1312 [comrade/them]
    ·
    7 months ago

    Yeah but the protection of the Russian minority was a key mandate.

    You want to talk about historical context yet fail to contextualize anything shown to you. Your "spurring debate" is actually just bad propaganda

    • ex10n@lemm.ee
      ·
      7 months ago

      Exactly! Ukraine's goals aim to unify a diverse population! Majority and minority alike. It's a beautiful resistance movement towards outside Russian aggression negatively impacting the lives of the Russian minority in Eastern Ukraine!

        • ex10n@lemm.ee
          ·
          7 months ago

          To my knowledge it was a direct policy decision from Putin. It'd be nice to have a free and fair election to see some positive change towards this poor decision making.

            • ex10n@lemm.ee
              ·
              7 months ago

              Similar to the reasons Moldova, Georgia, and the Kuril Islands were occupied. Russian expansionism.

                • ex10n@lemm.ee
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  NATO only expands with mutual agreement between the parties involved. If a sovereign country feels the need to join NATO, just follow their reasoning to learn about the historical context.

                  • carl_marks_1312 [comrade/them]
                    ·
                    7 months ago

                    NATO was a reaction to Soviet Russia and the Soviet Union was a reaction to NATO. If the Soviet Union fell, who was the great enemy? What was it's purpose, if not for keeping western global hegemeny. NATO historically has always been the agressing force. Learn about history to get a proper context, lib.