• please_dont [he/him]
    ·
    edit-2
    3 years ago

    tbh even with multi party sytem introduced rn the cpc is so popular and Xi the by far least corrupt and most left president since deng that you would see at worst a Chavez situation of sweeping elections despite insane levels of undermining. But nothing really is gained even considering that the chinese system is far from perfect or ideal.

    Nothing is gained cause the political wings inside the 90 million member CPC are of more political variety than most western parliementary "democracies" and their relative degree of presence and support from the people ideologicaly and within the party determine shift and changes in China's policy more effectively than change in governing parties has shifted any policies in western countries. And for the individual democratic and grassroots participation and voting at the local and lower levels is available for all and along with in party pressure, political struggle , groups and movements there are more than enough democratic avenues to make any change towards a more western liberal democracy a step down. And that can be true while thinking that as a socialist the CPC is still far behind in the democratic and worker's power avenues and structures i would like them to have.

    Only thing that would be accomplished by multi party term limit system is for the CPC to gain legitimacy in the eyes of A MINORITY of westerners , a minority of wetern leftists even. And thats without considering the thousand ways it could fuck up everything china has accomplished and make it stagnant and inefficient and the thousand more ways the west would gainfor destabilization and astroturfing