autismdragon [he/him, they/them] to philosophy • 11 months agoIs it the same article?imagemessage-square16 fedilinkarrow-up1150
arrow-up1150imageIs it the same article?autismdragon [he/him, they/them] to philosophy • 11 months agomessage-square16 Commentsfedilink
minus-squareShimmeringKoi [comrade/them]hexbear30·edit-211 months agoShip 2.1.4 changelog: -replaced boards on walkway -fixed issue with rudder disconnecting from boom sail -added additional rowing oars -drummer's position is no longer in the way of belowdecks stairway, as this causes pathfinding issues -reduced number of breasts on the figurehead to the correct number of two link
minus-squareThenThreeMore@startrek.websitehexbear17·11 months agoShip 2.1.5 changelog: -reverted change of number of breasts on the figurehead following user feedback. linkfedilink
minus-squareJohnBrownNote [comrade/them, des/pair]hexbear5·11 months agowe need a three-eyed to go with our 3-breasted figurehead link
minus-squarePlayer2@lemm.eehexbear13·11 months agoSo as long as you carefully document the changes to the ship, it remains the same ship. Makes sense I guess linkfedilink
minus-squaretheposterformerlyknownasgoodhexbear13·11 months agoIf you gradually remove all the bits of the ship and make a new ship out of all the bits you replaced, which ship would be the original? link
minus-squareMrShankles@reddthat.comhexbear11·11 months agoNeither. It was never the bits that made the ship, but the ship that was made from the bits gathered along the way linkfedilink
minus-squareJohnBrownNote [comrade/them, des/pair]hexbear2·11 months agothat's an "oh fuck off" question because you can't actually do that. Wearing parts would be dust, a broken board would still be broken, etc and an "all the replaced parts" reconstitution wouldn't hold its shape. link
minus-squaretheposterformerlyknownasgoodhexbear6·11 months agoYou are injecting the idea that bits are broken into the thought experiment link
minus-squareJohnBrownNote [comrade/them, des/pair]hexbear2·11 months agono, that's what happens when wood rots. link
minus-squareVenus [she/her]hexbear3·edit-211 months agoNo part of the original question necessarily indicates any wood has rotted, you added that Edit: no wait, I see. Some internet random in 2003 added that. Either way it's not a fundamental part of the thought experiment link
Same ship, different version.
Ship 2.1.4 changelog:
-replaced boards on walkway
-fixed issue with rudder disconnecting from boom sail
-added additional rowing oars
-drummer's position is no longer in the way of belowdecks stairway, as this causes pathfinding issues
-reduced number of breasts on the figurehead to the correct number of two
Ship 2.1.5 changelog:
-reverted change of number of breasts on the figurehead following user feedback.
we need a three-eyed to go with our 3-breasted figurehead
So as long as you carefully document the changes to the ship, it remains the same ship. Makes sense I guess
If you gradually remove all the bits of the ship and make a new ship out of all the bits you replaced, which ship would be the original?
Neither. It was never the bits that made the ship, but the ship that was made from the bits gathered along the way
that's an "oh fuck off" question because you can't actually do that. Wearing parts would be dust, a broken board would still be broken, etc and an "all the replaced parts" reconstitution wouldn't hold its shape.
You are injecting the idea that bits are broken into the thought experiment
no, that's what happens when wood rots.
No part of the original question necessarily indicates any wood has rotted, you added that
Edit: no wait, I see. Some internet random in 2003 added that. Either way it's not a fundamental part of the thought experiment