• MonsiuerPatEBrown@reddthat.com
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    why do we need a thousand mozarts ?

    why would we look to those that can never get enough to understand what it means to be satisfied ?

  • vexikron@lemmy.zip
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    These two are delusional.

    We are looking at tens to hundreds of millions of people fleeing where they live /this decade/ due to climate change.

    The tensions caused by immigrants moving to more developed western countries to escape the many wars going on in Africa and the Middle East, and now in Ukraine and Palestine are just a teeny tiny sampling of this.

    Also, it is likely we will hit peak oil this decade. Modern agriculture is reliant on petrochemical fertilizers which will become more expensive as oil does.

    Half the world lives in poverty, and America is the most economically unequal society in all of known human history, in terms of income disparity.

    There is absolutely no way to get to a trillion humans under our current economic and political paradigms, and no one knows or agrees on a framework that would.

    We will be lucky to make it to the end of this century with half the current world population.

    We are not going to be colonizing space anytime soon. The economics of building systems that can get enough humans and materiel to make a self sustaining colony on Mars are still many orders of magnitude away from being feasible, and life there would be hellish. Humans growing up on Mars would suffer horribly from the low gravity, even if they lived underground their whole lives to avoid radiation. Terraforming is still a pipe dream.

    Building a giant space rotating space cylinder for us all to live in is even more economically, scientifically and sociologically dubious. We cannot even figure out how to ecologically maintain the viability if our own homeworld, a self sustaining gigantic orbiting or interplanetary ship carrying even hundreds of humans is barely even realistically conceivable, to say nothing of what it would take to get to trillions.

    To say the things they are saying, they must be literally delusional, as in /should be locked away in mental institutions as dangers to society/.

    They should know these basic facts. We already know many wealthy elites are just literally building bunkers to escape the collapse of human civilization, which they have basically caused.

    Madness.

  • BigMacHole@lemm.ee
    ·
    1 year ago

    And then they could put those Mozarts to work in their slave shacks while complaining about the lack of Mozarts!

  • Phen@lemmy.eco.br
    ·
    1 year ago

    And approximately a trillion people to whom even a chocolate bar would be pretty much an once-in-a-lifetime luxury

  • knfrmity@lemmygrad.ml
    ·
    1 year ago

    Instead of billionaires we need to distribute resources equitably and provide education for all. Then we would also have a thousand Mozarts, and a thousand Newtons and a thousand Korolevs and a thousand Pasteurs while we're at it.

    Billionaires are just blocks along the road of civilizational progress and social development.

  • CrushKillDestroySwag
    ·
    1 year ago

    A trillion is a lot. Even if we all went vegan and the food supply was centrally managed, I'm not sure you could do that on Earth.