The argument for it is the results as presented in those 91 research articles i linked.
If you wanna argue with someone about uni, argue with the dude that compiled those articles, I'm barely thru the first few of them.
A pilot study where a group of people are given money tells us nothing about the effects on the economy of UBI. How will it increase tax? How will salaries adjust?
Looking at the 91 research articles, half of them don't even claim to be about UBI. They don't mention UBI. They are studies on direct cash transfers which is a different thing.
The argument for it is the results as presented in those 91 research articles i linked.
If you wanna argue with someone about uni, argue with the dude that compiled those articles, I'm barely thru the first few of them.
A pilot study where a group of people are given money tells us nothing about the effects on the economy of UBI. How will it increase tax? How will salaries adjust?
Looking at the 91 research articles, half of them don't even claim to be about UBI. They don't mention UBI. They are studies on direct cash transfers which is a different thing.
Okay? I don't really understand why you're trying to argue with me as if I'm some sort of arch-ubi advocate.
This isn't reddit, we're not recreationally arguing, we're here to learn
Then why are you trying to start an argument, instead of reading the research articles?