lysdexic@programming.devM to C++@programming.dev • 7 months agoC++ Should Be C++external-linkmessage-square9 fedilinkarrow-up110
arrow-up110external-linkC++ Should Be C++lysdexic@programming.devM to C++@programming.dev • 7 months agomessage-square9 Commentsfedilink
minus-squareMadhuGururajan@programming.devhexbear2·edit-26 months agoMy point is that the design is wrong. Nobody expects [] as lvalue to update a value. Your argument is descriptive, mine is prespcriptive. I am saying that the C++ committee is wrong on this one (or whoever designed it this way) linkfedilink
My point is that the design is wrong. Nobody expects [] as lvalue to update a value. Your argument is descriptive, mine is prespcriptive. I am saying that the C++ committee is wrong on this one (or whoever designed it this way)