I’d disagree, Tito’s socialism with Balkan characteristics is definitely Marxist, though obviously not the best adaptation of Marxism with Market socialism. However, they don’t even claim that ideology, as they say they’re a Maoist and call “Yugoslavism” socialism with Yugoslavia’s current conditions.
Hoxha did multiple excellent pieces on the history, practice, and revisionism of the Tito-clique. It's difficult to call them Marxist after everything he brings to light
Calling someone who identifies with the ideology of Yugoslavia a Marxist seems a bit of a stretch
I’d disagree, Tito’s socialism with Balkan characteristics is definitely Marxist, though obviously not the best adaptation of Marxism with Market socialism. However, they don’t even claim that ideology, as they say they’re a Maoist and call “Yugoslavism” socialism with Yugoslavia’s current conditions.
Hoxha did multiple excellent pieces on the history, practice, and revisionism of the Tito-clique. It's difficult to call them Marxist after everything he brings to light
Everyone was a revisionist to Hoxha. Crying wolf kind of makes the accusations lose potency fast.