• FuckyWucky [none/use name]
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Neoliberal austerity would prevent anything like this from happening on a large scale. You can see this with all the concerns about "cost".

    The "budget" on these things should be 'infinite'. Spend whatever amount of labor and resources available to build the plant. Instead they focus on short term profits.

    No wonder why China is spending more on renewable energy than rest of the world combined. Because China understands money isn't real, they are more than willing to give as much as possible for renewable energy.

  • Flyberius [comrade/them]
    ·
    11 months ago

    They can't even build a rail line. This will just be an excuse for public money to disappear into a black hole of private firms

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    ·
    11 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Ministers published a roadmap on Friday that recommits the government to building a fleet of nuclear reactors capable of producing 24GW by 2050 – enough to meet a quarter of the national electricity demand.

    The roadmap echoes plans put forward by the then prime minister, Boris Johnson, in 2022 to “build a new [reactor] every year” to wean Britain off fossil fuel.

    “The challenge is the industry has a record of running overbudget and behind schedule, so this does little to increase the UK’s energy security any time soon,” Ralston said.

    Doug Parr, Greenpeace UK’s chief scientist, said: “Every few months the government makes a grandiose public announcement about future nuclear in the hope that a big investor will believe the hype and step up to fund this 20th-century technology, but it isn’t working.

    “The energy industry knows that the economic case for slow, expensive nuclear just doesn’t add up, and the future is renewable,” Parr added.

    “This vague, aspirational announcement with its unevidenced claims of cheap energy is unlikely to change their minds when there are real reactors overshooting their massive construction budgets and showing them the truth.”


    The original article contains 601 words, the summary contains 189 words. Saved 69%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    ·
    11 months ago

    Well if it's like HS2, then you can expect a single reactor for the price of a whole country's worth...

    Nuclear is overpriced anyway. This is nothing but a boondoggle to tie down the next Labour government.