Obviously sympathetic to the mothers position here. However, based on my limited understanding of how this stuff works, if content is being viewed on 'the dark web' it likely wouldn't be obvious to internet providers, nor would a kid who's savvy enough to be on the 'the dark web' in the first place be really prevented from finding a work around to any potential block in place.
I'm a parent. This stuff scares the crap out of me, but I'm not sure we can actually legislate this stuff out of existence.
Measures like Google Family Link already exist if parents choose to use them.
I don't think legislation restricting what young people can do online would necessarily help. It's illegal for kids to take drugs and drink alcohol yet it still happens. Whatever measures are put in place, there's usually a way around.
Also, who would be held responsible for the child circumventing the restrictions? You can't hold the child responsible, so that would fall to the parent.
Is she accepting responsibility here for not better protecting her child? No, she's blaming others, and telling other people they should take responsibility.
Not that any of this would have made any difference here. These two murderers were absolutely demented, and keeping them off social media wouldn't have done much to prevent that.
It appears that Google are now investigating it, but only a couple of days ago it was being reported that there was another secret browser in Android which bypassed all parental and system security.
https://matan-h.com/google-has-a-secret-browser-hidden-inside-the-settings/
It's not a secret browser, it's the system browser. Most apps do not have a browser to view web pages, they use the system one (eg to display terms and conditions pages). The exploit here involved someone accessing such a page and sidestepping into another, because the page had links away, allowing a Google search or something and avoiding restrictions that were only applied to the main browser app.
This is more of a failure in parental control features not being fully comprehensive. The story is also much older than a couple days.
secret browser makes it sound so illicit. This looks like the default webview implementation that is able to be accessed after a series of pretty niche and complicated steps. Something that should be looked at and closed obviously, but this type of language is clickbait 101 and actually unhelpful for the discourse.
Then you should actually read it.
It's not the default webview, and it now has an open issue with Google
Yes my friend, it is the default webview. That explains the bare bones look to it, the back button functionality, and the history or lack of. The default webview on android isn't a full fledged browser and isn't meant to be.
This is literally meaningless. You should see the amount of shite users raise on the issue tracker. What you, or the author, should do is link to the issue in question.
I note that the comments on Hacker News also aren't favourable to this.
Are you okay?
Apart from being upvoted by an above average amount, the vast majority of comments talk about adjacent topics such as "I remember similar things with the NT login screen" or "WTF Google, bypassing the device restrictions is a bad thing."
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39226754
I'm great thanks. How're you?