Donorcycles: Motorcycle Helmet Laws and the Supply of Organ Donors

the PMC and harvesting organs of alienated people, name a better duo

  • Budwig_v_1337hoven [he/him]
    ·
    3 years ago

    Yea, that's exactly what I was getting at, actually; to collectively produce a culture where it's just the normal thing to do. At that point, there's no need to 'enforce' it, since it simply reproduces itself.

    • TraschcanOfIdeology [they/them, comrade/them]
      ·
      edit-2
      3 years ago

      Gotcha, no problem. It is easy to fall into the trap of the "noble savage" though. These kinds of societies have these enforcement mechanisms because there is a tension between the individual and the collective, so by way of customs they try to nip it in the bud, with varying degrees of success. People are capable of much more generosity and community than what capitalism allows them to, but societies are still self-sustaining, and collectively desirable behaviors don't just spring out of the blue: they are maintained by the society promoting them and discouraging any behaviors that run counter to the collective.

      • Budwig_v_1337hoven [he/him]
        ·
        3 years ago

        I'm with you, I just wouldn't really call custom and social practice enforcement, I guess. The force in enforcement evokes, for me, notions of state violence - and while that's certainly not the only way to think about enforcement, especially when it comes to notion such as reinforcement... I just prefer different vocabulary, I figure

        • TraschcanOfIdeology [they/them, comrade/them]
          ·
          edit-2
          3 years ago

          Oh I see! Sorry, I guess I didn't catch what you meant. I suppose that to me enforcement has more of an "active" connotation, so when you were talking about having desirable collective behaviors without enforcement, my mind just jumped at the notion of "everything will seamlessly work out and no one will have selfish ideas of try to fuck other people over if we all just agree that that is wrong", which is one that I find often, so I wanted to point out that even in collectivist societies, there's still a bit of an "active" reminder of the importance of the collective, in what I guess I see as societal "enforcement".

          Anyway, thanks for clearing it out, and I hope I made my point clear too. Cheers!

          • Budwig_v_1337hoven [he/him]
            ·
            3 years ago

            all good, I think I got your point. If anything, if that state of 'seamless working out' can exist, it certainly won't be brought about seamlessly, without friction or struggle - and it will need continual, collective, internal reinforcement to persist.

            anyways, good talk. Cheers!