• 🏳️‍⚧️ 新星 [she/they]@lemmygrad.ml
    hexagon
    ·
    9 months ago

    but is the inherent violence of existence in China, Russia, etc. brought up?

    No

    Also I need this author to define revisionism or revisionist because that’s a nonsensical second paragraph.

    Weeks cited Schweller’s 1994 paper in a footnote instead of defining it, so here’s that paper:

    Show

    Guess “revisionist” is literally defined here as a more academic way of saying “jackals and wolves”

    • relay@lemmygrad.ml
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      "Jackals" and wolves is an academic way of describing degrees of revisionism.

      Is classifying people revisionist rats also academic level on this scale? A certain scholar in Wisconsin might have been using American academic language do describe degrees of revisionism.

      There is also the strange undialectical manner of being satiated vs being insatiable. Some people have their needs met and others don't. Those that don't have their needs met will want to change things. Perhaps you should try to meet everyones needs as much as possible then you'll have fewer people causing you trouble, but no that would be communism.