• SickleRick [he/him]
    ·
    3 years ago

    I can view tweets on Nitter without logging in. On Twitter, I have to log in to scroll more than two tweets without Twitter capturing my mobile browser window and forcing me to sign up or login to use my browser.

    If you want to have a Twitter account and doomscroll that slop all day, Nitter isn't for you. But, if you don't want to have a Twitter account and just want to view a few tweets once in a while it's great, and I will die before I make a Twitter account just to look at clown girls.

      • Lilith [she/her]
        hexagon
        ·
        edit-2
        3 years ago

        huh. I’ve never had that problem, but my phone maybe isn’t as shitty

    • Lilith [she/her]
      hexagon
      ·
      3 years ago

      If you want to have a Twitter account and doomscroll that slop all day, Nitter isn’t for you

      a lot of the same discovery-focused user flows are present in Nitter though?

      before I make a Twitter account just to look at clown girls

      :wut:

    • Aryuproudomenowdaddy [comrade/them]
      ·
      3 years ago

      One of the hottest girls I ever dated did birthdays parties as a clown. Never saw her in the outfit, she did make me a balloon animal a couple times though.

  • Awoo [she/her]
    ·
    3 years ago

    For everyone that's currently banned, temp banned or refuses to have an account it's basically essential just to be able to view the site.

  • HumanBehaviorByBjork [any, undecided]
    ·
    edit-2
    3 years ago

    why would you log into a twitter account intentionally lol

    your browser's not making the requests to twitter, so you're not surveilled directly. that's the primary reason for any of these alt front ends. they might not have full feature parity, but they don't transmit a constant stream of your activity to half a dozen data brokers.

  • DragonballEvolution2 [any]
    ·
    3 years ago

    I prefer Nitter/Teddit because the actual twitter/reddit mobile UIs are actively hostile to non-logged-in users and keep trying to force me to download an app

  • layla
    ·
    edit-2
    3 years ago

    Who hurt you?

    I can't tell if this post is a joke lol

    • Lilith [she/her]
      hexagon
      ·
      3 years ago

      the design is clumsy and irritating enough on my phone that it stopped me earlier from sending a lib an image of a pig pooping on its balls

      the ability to shitpost ppb must not be infringed

  • nat_turner_overdrive [he/him]
    ·
    3 years ago

    it's for browsing twitter without having a twitter account and it serves its purpose well. I manually change twitter links to nitter so I don't have to deal with twitter blasting login popups and disallowing me from clicking to another tweet entirely

  • edwardligma [he/him]
    ·
    3 years ago

    i will never get a bird site account so its great for me

    i have a redirect extension on firefox that auto converts twitter links to nitter ones so i never have to deal with twitters bullshit

    ps everyone uses nitter.net but it seems to get overused at times and becomes very slow and glitchy, youre better off using one of the mirrors (i use nitter.42l.fr)

  • blobjim [he/him]
    ·
    3 years ago

    Doesn't it do the twitter requests server-side so your browser never has to make requests to Twitter.

  • StellarTabi [none/use name]
    ·
    3 years ago

    I can’t even log into my twitter account to follow accounts.

    it's for when you can't login, don't want to login, or don't have an account. Twitter is shit though, screenshots are better, and if it doesn't fit into a small screenshot, it shouldn't be a shitty """"tweet thread""""".

  • Lilith [she/her]
    hexagon
    ·
    edit-2
    3 years ago

    this press release claims it is more secure because it doesn’t use javascript, which frankly feels like a dinosaur take:

    https://fluxofficial.medium.com/flux-launches-open-source-alternative-twitter-front-end-focused-on-privacy-bed93634f5f5

    we get it gen-x, you hate JS and want to do everything with CSS and a dial up modem.

      • Lilith [she/her]
        hexagon
        ·
        edit-2
        3 years ago

        :agony-immense:

        okay, I’m actually interested in hearing this from someone born in the same decade, why do you think js ruins the internet?

        • luther7718 [he/him]
          ·
          3 years ago

          If you'll settle for a millennial's opinion, websites used to show more information and load more quickly and didn't crash or have front-end bugs or gobble up all your memory. Idk how much of that is due to JS itself and how much is just the fact that the internet now is just five or six bloated corporate megasites though.

          As for the question in your OP, Twitter intentionally cripples their site for anyone not logged into an account, so I use Nitter because otherwise I can't read the site at all.

        • extremesatanism [they/them]
          ·
          3 years ago

          JavaScript is extremely bloated and has little to no support for older devices, so people who can only afford older devices due to them being used, or people with extremely low-grade devices which lag anyways, cannot use a significant portion of the Internet.

  • Lilith [she/her]
    hexagon
    ·
    edit-2
    3 years ago

    I can’t even log into my twitter account to follow accounts from nitter. This is a dog shit user experience.

    Pure :zizek-preference:

    • Saint [he/him]
      ·
      3 years ago

      This is like complaining that when somebody links to an NYT article using archive.is, you can't use it to log in to the NYT site and add it to your saved articles.

      The whole point is being able to access without an account and without logging in.

      • Lilith [she/her]
        hexagon
        ·
        3 years ago

        better example would be if archive.is for NYT only captured half the content or something. I’m just trying to understand what the utility of nitter is.

      • Lilith [she/her]
        hexagon
        ·
        3 years ago

        how am I supposed to use it? one of the points of twitter is following interesting accounts, otherwise I’d have to bookmark them all or something. Does nitter have some kind of RSS integration I need to look for?

        • nat_turner_overdrive [he/him]
          ·
          3 years ago

          If you have a twitter account and you're fine browsing logged in, you're not supposed to use it. Twitter is openly hostile to anyone without an account, nitter allows people without twitter accounts to browse twitter without being forced to create an account.

          • Lilith [she/her]
            hexagon
            ·
            edit-2
            3 years ago

            okay, so it’s a passive client then for drive-by browsing? I just don’t understand what not having an account accomplishes.

            • nat_turner_overdrive [he/him]
              ·
              3 years ago

              Yes. It accomplishes not having an account. I don't want a twitter account, so I don't have one. Nitter lets me look at people saying dumb stuff on twitter. Simple as.

              • Lilith [she/her]
                hexagon
                ·
                3 years ago

                that’s a lot of work for someone to build a twitter client, but alright. I’m definitely a design nerd, which is probably part of why the site bothers me

                • nat_turner_overdrive [he/him]
                  ·
                  3 years ago

                  If you're a design nerd, consider that this is the twitter experience when I am not logged in: https://imgur.com/a/tQE1usg

                  Bright white theme, can't see shit past the constant login popups, can't click a link to another twitter account. Nitter saves me from all that horrible design.

                  • Lilith [she/her]
                    hexagon
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    3 years ago

                    oh yeah, thats’s a :dumpster-fire:. the mobile app’s dark mode though is :chefs-kiss: