Permanently Deleted
I tried to read you in goofld faith but the moment you basically said the dev shouldn't be able to have a side project, or a life for that matter, because they should be working for you to get the feature you want is unforgivable. It is libre software, you are free to contribute and add it yourself. Value others' work, you entitled fuck.
I see both sides here.
On one hand, you do have some good ideas in there, and I understand wanting to write them down and push for them.
On the other, I'm also a developer and too many issues can become spammy, and every day at work I mark issues as "not prioritized" or "won't do". They may be valid ideas, but I'm heads down on other more critical work that I need to focus on now.
I think it's important to remember that the devs are two devs, they don't have a project manager/PO to regulate issues and prioritize them. It's also an open source project, so a more valid use of time would be developing features yourself or gathering people who want to implement them and opening pull requests, rather than opening a ton of issues.
Also, I think you'd get things across the finish line if instead of opening 20 issues, you focused on one, maybe two, and pushed those really hard. Prioritize the issues yourself. Get those one or two done, then focus on the next. If you catapult 20 over the wall then it just looks like 20 issues and none of them are particularly important. The phrase "If everything is important, then nothing is important" definitely applies.
That being said, I'd definitely appreciate more transparency from the devs on the roadmap they envision, issues they want to focus on, and if they have capacity for us users to vote on our most critical features.
I don't really care all that much about any particular issue. I enjoy copying the ideas suggested by others in the fediverse and transforming them into new issues, as many individuals do not take this initiative.
who the fuck are you to decide what devs should do with their freetime you entitled brat ?
The project is missing developers, if you want to then implement them yourself , or fund raise the money using a bounty platform like polar, some of the ideas are fairly controversial and linus law of trail and error apply here, with that said i think lemmy could benefit from a add on system like those wordpress and discourse have and those ideas can be checked out.
Personally i had them accept some of my feedback before (e.g. i am the one who requested the ability to block an instance which got implemented despite one of the developers were against it and the other suggested i should switch instances).
Just try to be prudent and persuasive .
Isn’t assessing the issue on the issue tracker “listening to input” though?
Your options are
- do it yourself and create a pull request
- make a suggestion to the devs on the issue tracker, who have every right to reject it
- start a discussion here if you believe a feature is important enough to have public debate
That seems like a lot of options for listening to input to me.
What exactly is missing that you want to see? How could you add what you see is missing?
I'm confused. I opened the first 6 issues featured in your lemmy-ui link and you closed them all yourself?
You sound entitled as hell and most of your ideas read like stuff a project manager comes up with when trying to justify their job and I say that despite their being some good ideas in there. Anyway, it's Saturday night, surely there's better things to do than whine about the developers not implementing what you want?
