The names of previous Lemmy versions were all very boring and repetetive. We need something much more creative. Any ideas?

Show

  • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
    hexbear
    10
    3 months ago

    We've been notoriously bad about doing more frequent releases, but if we were to release every month, then naming them could get annoying really quickly.

    I'd prefer to just stay with the semantic version numbering, like a lot of projects with a ton of releases do. Like look at react's releases.

    The fun named versioning makes sense for operating systems, that release only like once a year, but not for apps, docker services, libraries, etc.

    • @nutomic@lemmy.ml
      hexagon
      hexbear
      2
      3 months ago

      We only do major versions around once a year so those could still be named, while using numbers for minor versions. Lemmy is more user-facing than react, so it would make sense to have a more user-friendly versioning.

  • RedWizard [he/him]
    hexbear
    10
    3 months ago

    Hmm so you're looking for a naming theme like the old Android scheme of Desserts or MacOS California Parks.

    List off the top of my head

    • Tree Species
    • Cities, Towns, Villages in Cuba
    • Mushroom Species
    • Names of Wildflowers

    That's all I got for now.

  • @souperk@reddthat.com
    hexbear
    7
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    It sounds a bit too soon to use release names, especially given that Lemmy is still in alpha.

    When a major release comes out, I suggest using colony names (fictional or real), like the pirate republic.

    In general, I like names that highlight the decentralised aspect of the fediverse.

  • @pmk@lemmy.sdf.org
    hexbear
    3
    3 months ago

    I like the TeX version scheme, it starts with version 3. After that it's:
    3.1
    3.14
    3.141
    3.1415 etc. Current stable release is 3.141592653. The message is that each version is a more accurate approximation of pi. It's not growing much bigger, but better.

  • grant 🍞@toast.ooo
    hexbear
    3
    3 months ago

    Having a name for a version would be nice for each major release (1.0.0 would have a name but 1.x.x wouldn’t, but 2.0.0 would, etc)

  • @maegul@lemmy.ml
    hexbear
    2
    3 months ago

    Call me a shit stirer but I can’t help but wonder if this violates rule 3? Which I say not to have this removed from here but because of the IMO weirdness of not wanting any lemmy-support posts here as though lemmy isn’t a growing space in need of supporting new users.

    • RedWizard [he/him]
      hexbear
      7
      3 months ago

      This isn't a support question, as in a trouble shooting question. This is a question to the Lemmy community about the platform itself. Its an input/feedback request, not a "how do I use Lemmy" question.

      • @maegul@lemmy.ml
        hexbear
        2
        3 months ago

        Fair ... I don't really care that much TBH ... it just seemed to be blurring the lines and I've always been ambivalent about the strident anti-support stance of this community ... so I thought it'd put it out there.

        • RedWizard [he/him]
          hexbear
          6
          3 months ago

          I mean, the poster is one of the two lead developers of the Lemmy platform. He might get a pass.

  • harc@szmer.info
    hexbear
    1
    1 month ago

    Just use track titles of Motörhead. Major release could have album titles.