frippa@lemmy.ml to Always the Same Map@lemmygrad.ml • 8 个月前Global burger indeximagemessage-square43 fedilinkarrow-up1103
arrow-up1103imageGlobal burger indexfrippa@lemmy.ml to Always the Same Map@lemmygrad.ml • 8 个月前message-square43 Commentsfedilink
minus-squareMagicicad@lemmygrad.mlhexbear21·8 个月前How is this index calculated? Is it pluralism? Because then China would be more “free” than the US. linkfedilink
minus-squarelil_tank@lemmygrad.mlhexbear14·8 个月前According to their own biaises China has absolute zero pluralism because it's a "one party state" linkfedilink
minus-squareporcupine@lemmygrad.mlhexbear23·edit-28 个月前China - 1 party - dictatorship US - 2 parties - democracy Russia - 8 parties - dictatorship the numbers don't lie linkfedilink
minus-square∞🏳️⚧️Edie [it/its]@lemmygrad.mlhexbear17·8 个月前China - 1 9 parties - dictatorship https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_People%27s_Congress linkfedilink
minus-squaredavel [he/him]@lemmygrad.mlhexbear13·8 个月前I don’t know, other than they start with their conclusion and work backward to construct metrics to fit it. Hannah Arendt would be proud. linkfedilink
minus-squarexkyfal18@lemmygrad.mlhexbear7·8 个月前Senator Armstrong is just your average US politician linkfedilink
How is this index calculated? Is it pluralism? Because then China would be more “free” than the US.
According to their own biaises China has absolute zero pluralism because it's a "one party state"
China - 1 party - dictatorship
US - 2 parties - democracy
Russia - 8 parties - dictatorship
the numbers don't lie
China -
19 parties - dictatorshiphttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_People%27s_Congress
I don’t know, other than they start with their conclusion and work backward to construct metrics to fit it. Hannah Arendt would be proud.
Senator Armstrong is just your average US politician