I read your whole comment, but to be honest, I'm not really sure where to begin with this, because it doesn't seem like you actually understand the situation and are making weird assumptions based on that misunderstanding

Hyprland isn’t the only window manager, there are others, it’s not like it is an essential part of Linux everyone must use.

I am really hoping you simply haven't read into the context of this, because in case you're not aware, this is not about hyprland the software at all or people contributing to it, this is about its main developer contributing to freedesktop.org projects such as wlroots (a Wayland compositor framework used by multiple projects including hyprland)

enforcing basic code of conduct rules

That they wrote themselves and want to apply everywhere. Obviously I’m not for insulting people because of sexual preferences, ethnicity, etc. but we don’t need liberals with a “Code of Conduct” to “protect” people. If a person doesn’t like a community, they don’t have to join it.

As I mentioned, this isn't about other people joining hyprland, it's about freedesktop.org, one of the most important organizations in the Linux ecosystem because it's responsible for many foundational components. Codes of Conduct (along with enforcement of those) are an essential safety tool in these kinds of community, as you simply can't tolerate Nazis and their ilk in a community like this without them forcing out all of the people who would be targeted by someone like that, who do exist in this community (the person enforcing the CoC in this instance being one of them)

The creator of Hyprland obviously isn’t bothered by having these alt-right/Nazi types in the community and hasn’t been willing to remove them. These liberals certainly won’t make him change his mind ...

This doesn't matter, because it's not about hyprland, that guy can fuck off to his Nazi cave as far as I'm concerned, we aren't trying to change hyprland. This is about this person trying to make himself at home in an organization full of the kind of people he targets, who will be under attack if someone like him is allowed this leeway. Those people are already part of this community and need to be kept safe, would you rather they be forced out?

US and NATO are also very pro-LGBTQ, does that mean we need to side with them against African and SEA countries who don’t have a good LGBTQ track record?

To be honest, I find this to be an extremely bad faith interpretation of my comment, and makes it sound like you didn't even read what I wrote. Again, this is not about liberals using the aesthetics of "queer rights" to manufacture consent to attack the global south, this is a community full of queer people banning an outright Nazi because he is a threat to them. This isn't about creating the image that the community is supposedly safe for queer people when it's not, it's about ensuring the safety of the queer people who are already here and contributing in major ways.

I have to be clear here, your comment is not some principled stand against imperialism, it is very close to being a defense for outright Nazis just because the people they're targeting for being vulnerable minorities happen to be liberals (you know, like most people in the west), and I really hope that this is just because you have some kind of misunderstanding of what's actually going on in this situation.