• multitotal@lemmygrad.ml
    ·
    2 个月前

    So what could possibly go wrong? Not much, according to the authors, who say ‘the risk that deploying European soldiers will escalate the conflict is overblown’. Indeed, their proposal gets enthusiastic backing from Glen Grant, a former UK defence attaché to the Baltics, and one-time adviser to Ukraine’s defence ministry.

    lmao

    ‘It’s a very good idea, and the western nations would learn valuable lessons from it too, even it was just helping with logistics and maintenance,’ he told me. ‘If Ukraine starts to lose the war, we’re going to have to do this anyway, so we’re only bringing it forward.’

    No, they don't actually have to do it. They want to do it.

    The big question is this: what would happen when bodybags started coming home? Troops stationed in significant numbers would be an obvious target for Russian missiles, and with no Article 5 to protect them, the Kremlin would surely be tempted to attack. Mr Grant says that any contributing European government would have to accept possible loss of life. He believes, though, that the benefits outweigh the risks, and that shedding blood would show Europe’s commitment in a way that giving weapons or money never can.

    Just sacrifice the poor bastards.

    • mathemachristian [he/him]
      ·
      edit-2
      2 个月前

      loss of life

      ah woops clumsy me where did I put that pesky thing again? oh no mustve fell out of my pocket while sightseeing in Ukraine