As the genocide in Gaza rages on, various European countries, including Spain and Ireland, have indicated that they are moving towards recognising the State of Palestine.

The new Irish prime minister, Simon Harris, argued that a group of like-minded countries officially recognising a Palestinian state would “lend weight to the decision and … send the strongest message”.

Meanwhile, Spanish officials argued that this could create momentum for others to do the same. Currently, most countries in the Global South, but only very few in the West, recognise the State of Palestine. As it stands, recognition of the State of Palestine is a political and symbolic move – it signals the recognition of the Palestinian right to sovereignty over the West Bank and Gaza. In reality, no such sovereignty exists – rather as an occupying force, the Israeli regime maintains de facto control over both territories and effectively controls everything that goes in and out, including people.

Some Palestinians and international human rights organisations argue that recognition is a crucial step towards securing Palestinian fundamental rights and one that offers more legal avenues to hold the Israeli regime accountable. Yet it is difficult to envision how recognition of a state that does not exist would change the reality on the ground for Palestinians facing systematic erasure.

In fact, it is pertinent to ask whether some states are pushing for this symbolic political move amid an ongoing genocide to avoid taking much more tangible actions, such as arms/trade embargoes and sanctions on the Israeli regime, to support Palestinians and reaffirm their right to sovereignty.

full article

  • RyanGosling [none/use name]
    hexbear
    11
    2 months ago

    I suppose an optimist could argue that if Palestine achieves statehood, they would be incorporated into international law which means Israel could be compelled to stop the genocide and further genocides or face intervention. But that's the problem. Who's going to intervene? Most of the powers have business or security interests in the region that only a developed "country" like Israel can address, unless they decide to pivot to the new Palestinian government. Also, it's a potentially ripe moment for western powers because if Palestine is incorporated into international law, Hamas may lose the leverage of being considered non-state combatants.

    But overall, I do agree that a "two state solution" is not feasible. You simply cannot co-exist with someone who fundamentally sees you as subhuman and wants you gone, especially when they run the government, have more weapons and money than you, and have the backing of the entire west.