But could they just use confusion of correlation with causation (like claiming that Communism cause bad climate and not that bad climate select for Communism), fake news, fake educational materials, typical Neo-Liberal redefinition of words, credibility from false flag organizations like tankiejerkers, flawed measurements of prosperity, and unreliable sources like victim of Communism who fled from Communist China but are now praising Communist China for economic prosperity.
But could they just use confusion of correlation with causation (like claiming that Communism cause bad climate and not that bad climate select for Communism), fake news, fake educational materials, typical Neo-Liberal redefinition of words, credibility from false flag organizations like tankiejerkers, flawed measurements of prosperity, and unreliable sources like victim of Communism who fled from Communist China but are now praising Communist China for economic prosperity.
Fair points, there's a lot of layers of misinformation in their thinking.