"Multiple state bar associations have threatened us," Browder said. "One even said a referral to the district attorney's office and prosecution and prison time would be possible."

"The truth is, most people can't afford lawyers," he said. "This could've shifted the balance and allowed people to use tools like ChatGPT in the courtroom that maybe could've helped them win cases."

Cant have robot stealing jobs from lawyers, can you imagine a machine replacing you with no prospect of compensation? What kind of society does that with the threat of poverty 🤔.

  • JuneFall [none/use name]
    ·
    2 years ago

    In the US you often have to invoke precedence, which is kinda stupid and say what you want.

    In civil law of other states it is the judges job to reasonably explore the avenues which might be the case and which might help the persecuted, too. So for example if I have no idea what the law is and say something wrong or that isn't the case, then it is the judge's responsibility - in principle - to see what I actually meant. In practice judges are dicks, but it is better than to force humans to invoke spells from arcane knowledge and with words that don't reflect reality.