help-circle
  • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
    hexbear
    3
    2 months ago

    It’s unsurprising that this ecofascist, evolutionary psychology garbage might come out of Stanford.

    H. sapiens tends to respond to problems in simplistic, reductionist, mechanical ways. Simplistic diagnoses lead to simplistic remedies.

    Talk about reductionist, Dr. Rees. This guy reeks of 19th century white male anthropologist.

    link
    fedilink
    • @eleitl@lemmy.ml
      hexagon
      M
      hexbear
      4
      2 months ago

      Please don't use the term ecofascist indiscriminately. We don't do that around here.

      How would you respond to the problem of overshoot?

      link
      fedilink
      • CascadeOfLight [he/him]
        hexbear
        3
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        The """problem of overshoot""" is that the human species is still in the death grip of capitalism. The task of preserving a habitable world is not being ignored because humanity is just too stupid to understand how to do it, but because it's incredibly profitable for a tiny handful of extremely rich and powerful people to enforce the current course by any means necessary, including extreme violence - or indeed, funding academics to point the blame at anything but themselves. "It's just human nature!"

        I would respond to the problem of 'over' shoot by 'exactly' shooting the capitalists in their rotten hearts, with the help of an army of communist soldiers.

        link
        fedilink
      • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
        hexbear
        3
        2 months ago

        To be fair, if there’s a coherent definition of ecofascism, I’m not sure what it is, and I think I have seen ecofascism be over-applied, and I didn’t read the entire article nor look deeply into Rees’ body of work. But eugenics, ecofascism, and capitalism are closely linked.

        From the above-linked Harris interview:

        Your book presents a belief in eugenics as one of the most important intellectual threads that runs through Palo Alto’s history. Is eugenics still a force in the region today?

        We’ve seen a huge swing back towards eugenic philosophy in Palo Alto. There are a lot of startups invested in eugenic technology. If you ask people, “Is that eugenics?” they’ll say “No!” But if you ask, “Are you trying to improve the quality of the baby stock?” “Well, yes, obviously.” These people are constantly forgetting the names for what they’re doing, intentionally, or as a useful adaptation, because then they can sell old-school eugenics as some new app.

        Big Oil Helped Shape Stanford’s Latest Climate-Research Focus

        link
        fedilink
      • Shinji_Ikari [he/him]
        hexbear
        2
        2 months ago

        Politically acceptable technical ‘solutions’

        Come on man this whistle woke my cremated dog up

        link
        fedilink