I've come to the realization that Microsoft's strategy of Embrace Extend Extinguish is literally a 1-for-1 textbook implementation of the process of recuperation, specifically it's a recuperation of the radical FOSS counterculture. I'm suspecting that some Microsoft executive read Marxist theory as a guide on how to do a better capitalism.
I'd argue that the original philosophy of FOSS is moreso anarchist than libertarian (though certainly idealistic).
The original movement made an important mistake that was only fixed with GPLv3 that allowed it's exploitation, but most of the radical free/libre software people recognize it was a mistake. The more libertarian brained people that are fine with being exploited have mostly divested from the GNU/FSF folk.
Fair enough, I didn't want to call them anarchists while criticizing them, to avoid being sectarian.
I see. To be clear, I was criticizing their original mistake in the method (which of course the movement admits), not at all the goal (being in efrect the decommodization of software) which in 100% in favour of.
Cool, I agree wholeheartedly, intellectual property rights in general kill people on a daily basis, and technocapital literally can't function without having a general repository of freeuse software.