Aspiring Author K. Renee was reportedly locked out of her own content on Google Docs after Google flagged it as "inappropriate."

  • booty [he/him]
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Guys, settle down. This is a clickbait title, google isn't "censoring" anything and no part of the content of her silly hockey porn was deemed unacceptable by Google. What happened is that she had a ton of people accessing these documents and Google inaccurately flagged it as her spamming them at people unsolicited. That's why she was locked from sharing them, because Google('s automated systems) assumed it was a bot account doing spam.

    • LENINSGHOSTFACEKILLA [he/him]
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      For YEARS my google calendar was spammed with "FUCK MY PUSSY @2PM (insert dangerous link here)" type shit but like a dozen people reading some amateur smut gets flagged immediately.

  • astreus@lemmy.ml
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    "Romance" is such a crap term! She was writing porn. Likely with minors. I'm involved with a lot of authors, some also write porn open-door spice, and the only things that get Google bans (from what I've been told) are kiddie porn and extreme gore.

    While the dangers of handing your documents to Google can't be overstated, don't sympathise too much with this person.

    EDIT: y'all know she was only blocked from sharing, right? She did not lose access to any of her work and no one has the right to demand a middle man for their content.

    Scenario: Jack draws some heinous CP cartoon. He wants to share it with Alice. He asks Jill to hand it to Alice. Jill says "I am not handing this to anybody." Should Jill be on blast for censoring Jack?

    Scenario 2: Jack draws some middling soft-core porn. He wants to share it with Alice. He asks Jill to hand it to Alice. Jill says "I am not handing this to anybody." Should Jill be on blast for censoring Jack?

    • OrlandoDeCabron [he/him]
      ·
      6 months ago

      Brother, people should be allowed to entertain and write down horrific thoughts, especially in a private context, and it not be censored. Policing thought crimes is orders of magnitude more horrific than whatever vile shit someone can put on a page.

      • astreus@lemmy.ml
        ·
        6 months ago

        I think we read different articles:

        This person was not allowed to SHARE the things written. That's not a thought crime.

  • SuperSpruce@lemmy.zip
    ·
    6 months ago

    Couldn't she just copy the text to a text file or .odt file and perhaps email it (or better yet, physically copy it with a USB drive) if she can't direct share it?