Also, I don't just mean they are reactionary in certain area or in their personal life (Like Aristotle was important for biology despite being an apologies for slavery)?
I mean worth looking into their thinking precisely in areas where they're reactionary.
Possible suggestions (not saying they're justified) that I expect people would put forward include:
- Carl Scmitt
- Heidegger
I was gonna say Paul Cockshott but thrn I saw, "worth looking into their thinking precisely in areas where they’re reactionary." I don't think that actually exists.
deleted by creator
Yes, he uses simplistic analyses from a position of ignorance when it comes to LGBTQ folks, analyses that, to me, reveal a dogmatism for a particularly reactionary branch of Soviet Marxism. And that reflects poorly on his other work.
Yh he's wack af for anything even slightly LGBT related.
Is he reactionary in any other ways?
I'm not aware of other ways but I also haven't gone looking for them.